SecureSphere WAF for AWS (BYOL)

SecureSphere WAF for AWS (BYOL) is a virtual-appliance web application firewall deployed in a customer's AWS account that inspects HTTP/S traffic, blocks common web attacks (for example OWASP Top 10), and provides centralized policy management and logging through SecureSphere management components.

40 Ref Customers

Website

MarketsWeb Application & API Protection (WAAP)Firewalls

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | SecureSphere WAF for AWS (BYOL) | AWS WAF | F5 BIG-IP Advanced WAF | |--------|----------------------------------|---------|-------------------------| | Starting Price | Not publicly listed for BYOL; contract-based licensing requiring sales engagement | Published usage-based pricing model; pricing varies with rules and request volumes (consult vendor for details) | Typically quote-based; pay-as-you-go marketplace options may be available | | Recommended for | Enterprises wanting an appliance-style WAF control in AWS | Teams wanting a cloud-native WAF integrated with AWS services | Enterprises using the BIG-IP ecosystem and advanced policy/tuning | | Key Strength | Centralized SecureSphere-style management and mature WAF feature set | Fast to deploy, native integrations, managed rule ecosystem | Advanced behavioral learning and policy tuning capabilities | | Key Weakness | Less transparent pricing; higher operational overhead than managed edge WAAP | Can become expensive at scale; tuning required | Cost and operational complexity | - Direct competitors and key differentiators - AWS WAF - Strength: native integration with AWS management and operational workflows. - Weakness: cost can be unpredictable at very high request volumes or during attacks. - F5 Advanced WAF - Strength: behavioral learning and enterprise controls. - Weakness: higher operational complexity and cost compared with cloud-native WAFs. - Pricing comparison (value vs alternatives) - SecureSphere BYOL: requires sales engagement for license pricing; evaluate total cost including AWS infrastructure and support. - AWS WAF: lower entry friction but a usage-based pricing model can increase costs depending on traffic and rule usage. - Market share and adoption trends - Analyst summaries and market pages list Imperva among notable vendors; available snippets do not provide precise market share figures in the dataset used for this report.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	SecureSphere WAF for AWS (BYOL)	AWS WAF	F5 BIG-IP Advanced WAF
Starting Price	Not publicly listed for BYOL; contract-based licensing requiring sales engagement	Published usage-based pricing model; pricing varies with rules and request volumes (consult vendor for details)	Typically quote-based; pay-as-you-go marketplace options may be available
Recommended for	Enterprises wanting an appliance-style WAF control in AWS	Teams wanting a cloud-native WAF integrated with AWS services	Enterprises using the BIG-IP ecosystem and advanced policy/tuning
Key Strength	Centralized SecureSphere-style management and mature WAF feature set	Fast to deploy, native integrations, managed rule ecosystem	Advanced behavioral learning and policy tuning capabilities
Key Weakness	Less transparent pricing; higher operational overhead than managed edge WAAP	Can become expensive at scale; tuning required	Cost and operational complexity

Direct competitors and key differentiators
- AWS WAF
  - Strength: native integration with AWS management and operational workflows.
  - Weakness: cost can be unpredictable at very high request volumes or during attacks.
- F5 Advanced WAF
  - Strength: behavioral learning and enterprise controls.
  - Weakness: higher operational complexity and cost compared with cloud-native WAFs.
Pricing comparison (value vs alternatives)
- SecureSphere BYOL: requires sales engagement for license pricing; evaluate total cost including AWS infrastructure and support.
- AWS WAF: lower entry friction but a usage-based pricing model can increase costs depending on traffic and rule usage.
Market share and adoption trends
- Analyst summaries and market pages list Imperva among notable vendors; available snippets do not provide precise market share figures in the dataset used for this report.