Imprivata Identity Governance

Name: Imprivata Identity Governance
Brand: Imprivata

Simple and secure access management for mission-critical industries

Est 2000|Valuation $492.5M|Raised $2.6B

LinkedIn 28K|Website|Web traffic 466K|FTEs 833|HQ Waltham, Massachusetts, US

MarketsIdentity Provider (IdP) & Single Sign-On (SSO)Identity Governance & Administration (IGA)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- SailPoint vs Imprivata IGA: This comparison is affected by the acquisition; SailPoint’s acquisition of Imprivata’s IGA business implies a strategic direction toward consolidation into SailPoint Identity Security Cloud. Evaluators should assume SailPoint’s strategic end state involves consolidation. - Microsoft Entra ID Governance: Commonly selected when identity and productivity workloads are Microsoft-centric and organizations prefer governance capabilities close to the directory. Publicly published per-user pricing can be a procurement advantage. - Saviynt / One Identity / Omada: These vendors compete on cloud-native approaches, application governance depth, and connector ecosystems. Peer discussions indicate these vendors are frequently short-listed in enterprise IGA evaluations.

	Imprivata Identity Governance / IGA	Microsoft Entra ID Governance	SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based); EULA suggests per-managed-identity licensing	Published per-user pricing available from the vendor; prerequisites may apply	Not transparently published as a simple list price; typically quote/contract based with per-identity metrics referenced in some documents
Primary fit	Healthcare organizations seeking healthcare-focused identity lifecycle automation; organizations with an existing Imprivata footprint	Microsoft-centric organizations standardizing governance within Entra/Azure ecosystems	Large enterprises seeking deep governance features, certifications, role modeling, and broad application connectivity
Key Strength	Healthcare focus; EHR/HR integration materials; alignment with Imprivata access workflows	Tight integration with Microsoft stack; publicly available pricing information and a straightforward procurement path for Microsoft-centric customers	Perception of mature governance capabilities; extensive connector ecosystem and partner network
Key Weakness	Platform transition risk following acquisition; limited public pricing; relatively low volume of public third-party reviews for the IGA product	Licensing complexity and add-on requirements; best value when the organization is already standardized on Microsoft	Perceived implementation complexity and potentially higher services costs

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

SailPoint vs Imprivata IGA: This comparison is affected by the acquisition; SailPoint’s acquisition of Imprivata’s IGA business implies a strategic direction toward consolidation into SailPoint Identity Security Cloud. Evaluators should assume SailPoint’s strategic end state involves consolidation.
Microsoft Entra ID Governance: Commonly selected when identity and productivity workloads are Microsoft-centric and organizations prefer governance capabilities close to the directory. Publicly published per-user pricing can be a procurement advantage.
Saviynt / One Identity / Omada: These vendors compete on cloud-native approaches, application governance depth, and connector ecosystems. Peer discussions indicate these vendors are frequently short-listed in enterprise IGA evaluations.

	Imprivata Identity Governance / IGA	Microsoft Entra ID Governance	SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based); EULA suggests per-managed-identity licensing	Published per-user pricing available from the vendor; prerequisites may apply	Not transparently published as a simple list price; typically quote/contract based with per-identity metrics referenced in some documents
Primary fit	Healthcare organizations seeking healthcare-focused identity lifecycle automation; organizations with an existing Imprivata footprint	Microsoft-centric organizations standardizing governance within Entra/Azure ecosystems	Large enterprises seeking deep governance features, certifications, role modeling, and broad application connectivity
Key Strength	Healthcare focus; EHR/HR integration materials; alignment with Imprivata access workflows	Tight integration with Microsoft stack; publicly available pricing information and a straightforward procurement path for Microsoft-centric customers	Perception of mature governance capabilities; extensive connector ecosystem and partner network
Key Weakness	Platform transition risk following acquisition; limited public pricing; relatively low volume of public third-party reviews for the IGA product	Licensing complexity and add-on requirements; best value when the organization is already standardized on Microsoft	Perceived implementation complexity and potentially higher services costs