Imprivata OneSign
Simple and secure access management for mission-critical industries
Est 2000|Valuation $492.5M|Raised $2.6B
Platform CoversPrivileged Access Management (PAM)
Published Jul 9, 2026
| Typical pricing model | Quote-based, module- and environment-dependent; limited public list pricing | Public entry points exist for standalone SSO; suites and bundles are common | Often bundled with Microsoft 365/Entra licensing; pricing depends on tiers and licensing model |
| Primary use case | Shared clinical workstations, badge/biometric local authentication, VDI fast switching, roaming users | Broad workforce SaaS SSO/MFA, integration catalog, lifecycle automation | Microsoft-centric enterprises, Conditional Access, integrated identity + device security |
| Key strength | Endpoint- and workflow-focused SSO for shared devices and VDI integrations | Wide integration catalog and cloud IAM platform breadth | Deep integration with Microsoft ecosystem and security controls |
| Key weakness | Can be higher cost and operationally involved if only basic SaaS SSO/MFA is required; agent lifecycle and edge-case maintenance | Cost and complexity increase with add-ons; governance/workflow features may add expense | Complexity increases with broader Microsoft security tooling requirements |
Where Imprivata is differentiated:
Where competitors may be preferable:
Practitioner perspectives frequently emphasize that Imprivata’s SSO approach focuses on workstation- and agent-based automation rather than functioning solely as a cloud IdP; product selection should be driven by the specific SSO problem being solved.