inFeedo

Name: inFeedo
Brand: inFeedo AI
Rating: 4.7 (81 reviews)

Helping 330+ CHROs make the voice of every employee feel heard and valued.

Est 2013|Valuation $56.3M|Raised $16M

LinkedIn 54K|Web traffic 81K|FTEs 114|HQ New York, New York, US

MarketsEmployee Engagement & Survey Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis (where alternatives may excel)

- Culture Amp: often used for benchmarks, templates, and established engagement workflows; it has a larger review footprint which can reduce perceived buyer risk relative to smaller vendors. However, Culture Amp pricing is often provided via quotes and can increase with added modules. - Qualtrics EX: fits use cases that require advanced survey logic, enterprise governance, and sophisticated analytics; this typically comes with greater complexity and enterprise pricing. - Viva Glint: may be cost-effective for organizations already licensing Microsoft products and seeking straightforward per-user licensing, but organizations not aligned with Microsoft tooling may face integration considerations.

Adoption / market presence signals

PeerSpot mindshare metrics indicate inFeedo is smaller within that dataset; this should be interpreted as engagement on that platform rather than market share.

	inFeedo	Microsoft Viva Glint	Lattice Engagement
Starting Price	Quote-based (no public list price)	Published per-user pricing available from the vendor (vendor publishes per-user licensing)	Published add-on per-seat pricing available from the vendor; vendor publishes minimum annual commitment
Best For	Enterprises seeking chat-based listening combined with HR ops automation and communications in one platform	Microsoft-centric organizations requiring integration with Viva/M365	Mid-market to enterprise organizations that want engagement functionality integrated with performance/people ops tools
Key Strength	Conversational UX and multichannel delivery combined with HR service automation capabilities	Published per-user pricing and Microsoft ecosystem alignment	Published add-on pricing for Engagement and integration with broader performance/OKR features
Key Weakness	Price opacity; review signals about reporting/export depth and occasional support/performance concerns	Value is strongest for organizations already committed to Microsoft licensing and tooling	May be less focused on conversational listening and HR service automation than some specialized vendors

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis (where alternatives may excel)

Culture Amp: often used for benchmarks, templates, and established engagement workflows; it has a larger review footprint which can reduce perceived buyer risk relative to smaller vendors. However, Culture Amp pricing is often provided via quotes and can increase with added modules.
Qualtrics EX: fits use cases that require advanced survey logic, enterprise governance, and sophisticated analytics; this typically comes with greater complexity and enterprise pricing.
Viva Glint: may be cost-effective for organizations already licensing Microsoft products and seeking straightforward per-user licensing, but organizations not aligned with Microsoft tooling may face integration considerations.

Adoption / market presence signals

PeerSpot mindshare metrics indicate inFeedo is smaller within that dataset; this should be interpreted as engagement on that platform rather than market share.

	inFeedo	Microsoft Viva Glint	Lattice Engagement
Starting Price	Quote-based (no public list price)	Published per-user pricing available from the vendor (vendor publishes per-user licensing)	Published add-on per-seat pricing available from the vendor; vendor publishes minimum annual commitment
Best For	Enterprises seeking chat-based listening combined with HR ops automation and communications in one platform	Microsoft-centric organizations requiring integration with Viva/M365	Mid-market to enterprise organizations that want engagement functionality integrated with performance/people ops tools
Key Strength	Conversational UX and multichannel delivery combined with HR service automation capabilities	Published per-user pricing and Microsoft ecosystem alignment	Published add-on pricing for Engagement and integration with broader performance/OKR features
Key Weakness	Price opacity; review signals about reporting/export depth and occasional support/performance concerns	Value is strongest for organizations already committed to Microsoft licensing and tooling	May be less focused on conversational listening and HR service automation than some specialized vendors