- Important caveat on review coverage
- Review coverage is fragmented across product naming:
- “Infor CloudSuite” (Gartner Peer Insights)
- “Infor CloudSuite Corporate” (G2)
- “Infor CloudSuite ERP” (TrustRadius)
- “Infor Financials & Supply Management” (TrustRadius shows a very small review base)
- This fragmentation makes it harder to isolate feedback that is purely about CloudSuite Financials versus broader ERP experiences.
- Gartner Peer Insights (Infor CloudSuite – limited sample)
- Overall rating shown in captured snippets: a moderate rating with a limited number of ratings.
- Example positive sentiment: "The financials have strong integration with Excel so financial processes run more easily and changes are simpler to manage."
- Example negative/limitation: review titles mention satisfactory performance and limited customization options in some cases.
- G2 (Infor CloudSuite Corporate – small review snapshot)
- Rating shown: a moderate rating with a small review snapshot.
- Example balanced quotes:
- Like: described as intuitive and easy to operate in some reports.
- Dislike: a steep learning curve during initial adoption is noted by some reviewers.
- Takeaway: some users describe the system as intuitive while still noting adoption and training needs—common in ERP deployments where process depth requires training.
- TrustRadius (Infor CloudSuite ERP – broader ERP scope)
- TrustRadius shows a larger review sample for Infor CloudSuite ERP, which likely includes deployments where financials are part of a broader suite.
- Positive feedback example: configuration with limited custom development is cited by some reviewers.
- Negative feedback examples: longer-than-desired cycle time for bug fixes and enhancements; integration with related solutions (e.g., Infor WMS) could be improved; some reviewers express dissatisfaction with reliance on Infor's Birst analytics for reporting.
- TrustRadius (Infor Financials & Supply Management – very small review base)
- TrustRadius lists Infor Financials & Supply Management with a very small number of reviews in the captured snippet; that sample size is insufficient for generalization.
- Community/Social (Reddit) — anecdotal observations
- Public forum threads include strongly negative anecdotal commentary in some cases (e.g., "Infor CloudSuite is currently driving me up a wall").
- Data/analytics integration pain is a recurring theme in technical forums; one thread on extracting Infor LN data to a cloud warehouse notes connectors that cover only base financials and calls out complex interconnected tables and keys that make extraction more difficult.
- Note: public forum comments are anecdotal, may reflect specific versions or implementations, and can skew negative due to the help-seeking nature of posts.
- Why customers chose Infor (themes from reviews)
- Configuration flexibility with limited custom development.
- Ability to run broad end-to-end operations (order-to-cash, procure-to-pay, finance, manufacturing, warehouse) on one platform.
- Excel integration affinity for finance teams.
- Why some customers leave / consider alternatives (themes from reviews)
- Slower bug fix cycles and enhancement timelines.
- Integration friction, including with Infor-adjacent products (e.g., WMS).
- Reporting/analytics tool preferences; some customers prefer to use third-party analytics and reporting platforms instead of the vendor-default analytics tooling.
- Complexity of data extraction and modeling for modern analytics stacks.