INGENIOUS.BUILD

Name: INGENIOUS.BUILD
Brand: INGENIOUS.BUILD
Rating: 3.2 (1 reviews)

Building the Future, Together.

Est 2016|Valuation $78M|Raised $43.5M|10 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 6K|Web traffic 7K|FTEs 98|HQ Nashville, Tennessee, US

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Versus Procore: INGENIOUS emphasizes simpler pricing and a more modern user experience in vendor materials, while Procore offers a more mature ecosystem, broader third-party integrations, and a larger user community that can reduce risk for some buyers. - Versus Autodesk Construction Cloud: Autodesk products are often advantageous when deep BIM/design continuity is required; INGENIOUS may be preferable when cross-stakeholder collaboration and accounting integrations are primary requirements. - Market adoption signals: a partner claim of widespread internal users within a partner organization suggests enterprise interest, but broader market share is not established from public data.

Competitive notes from public competitor materials

Procore’s public materials emphasize enterprise offerings and require contact for detailed pricing.
Autodesk Construction Cloud pricing is presented in a product- and region-dependent manner and often requires sales engagement for bundled deals.

	INGENIOUS.BUILD	Procore	Autodesk Construction Cloud (Autodesk Build)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based); vendor describes per-seat pricing	Quote-based (often based on annual construction volume and modules)	Pricing varies by product; contact sales for bundles and enterprise deployments
Best For	Teams prioritizing cross-stakeholder collaboration and organizations seeking per-seat pricing predictability	Mid-market to enterprise contractors and owners needing a mature ecosystem and broad integrations	Design and BIM-focused organizations already using Autodesk tools that require document and issues coordination
Key Strength	Vendor positioning focused on collaboration across stakeholders; accounting integrations and mobile/field workflow claims	Mature platform with a large partner and user ecosystem and extensive integrations	Strong integration with Autodesk design and BIM tools; document and model coordination features
Key Weakness	Limited public security/compliance documentation; limited mainstream review footprint; third-party allegations about data reliability exist	Can be costly depending on configuration; pricing and implementation can be opaque	May require integration across multiple Autodesk products; pricing and adoption complexity for non-Autodesk organizations

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Versus Procore: INGENIOUS emphasizes simpler pricing and a more modern user experience in vendor materials, while Procore offers a more mature ecosystem, broader third-party integrations, and a larger user community that can reduce risk for some buyers.
Versus Autodesk Construction Cloud: Autodesk products are often advantageous when deep BIM/design continuity is required; INGENIOUS may be preferable when cross-stakeholder collaboration and accounting integrations are primary requirements.
Market adoption signals: a partner claim of widespread internal users within a partner organization suggests enterprise interest, but broader market share is not established from public data.

Competitive notes from public competitor materials

Procore’s public materials emphasize enterprise offerings and require contact for detailed pricing.
Autodesk Construction Cloud pricing is presented in a product- and region-dependent manner and often requires sales engagement for bundled deals.

	INGENIOUS.BUILD	Procore	Autodesk Construction Cloud (Autodesk Build)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based); vendor describes per-seat pricing	Quote-based (often based on annual construction volume and modules)	Pricing varies by product; contact sales for bundles and enterprise deployments
Best For	Teams prioritizing cross-stakeholder collaboration and organizations seeking per-seat pricing predictability	Mid-market to enterprise contractors and owners needing a mature ecosystem and broad integrations	Design and BIM-focused organizations already using Autodesk tools that require document and issues coordination
Key Strength	Vendor positioning focused on collaboration across stakeholders; accounting integrations and mobile/field workflow claims	Mature platform with a large partner and user ecosystem and extensive integrations	Strong integration with Autodesk design and BIM tools; document and model coordination features
Key Weakness	Limited public security/compliance documentation; limited mainstream review footprint; third-party allegations about data reliability exist	Can be costly depending on configuration; pricing and implementation can be opaque	May require integration across multiple Autodesk products; pricing and adoption complexity for non-Autodesk organizations

INGENIOUS.BUILD

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Competitive notes from public competitor materials

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Competitive notes from public competitor materials

02Market Map