IntegrityNext

Name: IntegrityNext
Brand: IntegrityNext
Rating: 4.4 (47 reviews)

Achieve smart compliance, drive sustainability impact, and maximize business value efficiently with IntegrityNext.

Est 2016|Raised $113.9M

LinkedIn 23K|Website|Web traffic 19K|FTEs 160|HQ Munich, Bavaria, DE

MarketsSupplier Intelligence Vendor Risk Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- IntegrityNext is positioned as an operational platform for collecting evidence, managing workflows, and supporting multi-regulation due diligence. EcoVadis is typically selected when buyers want an external, vendor-issued scorecard and benchmarking across suppliers. Assent focuses more on regulated supply chain compliance programs and managed services in certain verticals. - Supplier experience is an important differentiator. Programs that rely on high supplier participation (particularly SMEs) should evaluate each vendor’s supplier user experience, language support, and how questionnaires adapt to supplier context; reviewer feedback indicates that generic questionnaires can be problematic.

	IntegrityNext	EcoVadis	Assent
Starting Price	Publicly unclear; a third-party marketplace lists a published annual starting price for certain packages	Public pricing information varies by plan; EcoVadis offers rated-company subscriptions	Typically enterprise, quote-based pricing (public list pricing not prominent)
Typical Fit	Organizations seeking a platform for supplier due diligence workflows, document collection, and regulatory evidence management	Organizations seeking standardized supplier sustainability scorecards and benchmarking across suppliers	Organizations with complex regulatory/product compliance needs and supplier data management requirements
Key Strength	Focus on workflow and orchestration, reported handling of large supplier volumes in enterprise deployments, and documented ERP integrations in some case studies	Standardized scorecards and benchmarking with established ecosystem adoption	Depth in regulated compliance domains and managed-services orientation
Key Weakness	Questionnaire fit and supplier burden risk; limited public documentation of vendor-held security certifications; pricing opacity	Suppliers may view rating processes as resource-intensive; perception of rating as box-checking in some contexts	Implementation scope and cost can be heavier for smaller programs

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

IntegrityNext is positioned as an operational platform for collecting evidence, managing workflows, and supporting multi-regulation due diligence. EcoVadis is typically selected when buyers want an external, vendor-issued scorecard and benchmarking across suppliers. Assent focuses more on regulated supply chain compliance programs and managed services in certain verticals.
Supplier experience is an important differentiator. Programs that rely on high supplier participation (particularly SMEs) should evaluate each vendor’s supplier user experience, language support, and how questionnaires adapt to supplier context; reviewer feedback indicates that generic questionnaires can be problematic.

	IntegrityNext	EcoVadis	Assent
Starting Price	Publicly unclear; a third-party marketplace lists a published annual starting price for certain packages	Public pricing information varies by plan; EcoVadis offers rated-company subscriptions	Typically enterprise, quote-based pricing (public list pricing not prominent)
Typical Fit	Organizations seeking a platform for supplier due diligence workflows, document collection, and regulatory evidence management	Organizations seeking standardized supplier sustainability scorecards and benchmarking across suppliers	Organizations with complex regulatory/product compliance needs and supplier data management requirements
Key Strength	Focus on workflow and orchestration, reported handling of large supplier volumes in enterprise deployments, and documented ERP integrations in some case studies	Standardized scorecards and benchmarking with established ecosystem adoption	Depth in regulated compliance domains and managed-services orientation
Key Weakness	Questionnaire fit and supplier burden risk; limited public documentation of vendor-held security certifications; pricing opacity	Suppliers may view rating processes as resource-intensive; perception of rating as box-checking in some contexts	Implementation scope and cost can be heavier for smaller programs