Jit (fka Cbrix)

Name: Jit (fka Cbrix)
Brand: Jit (fka Cbrix)
Rating: 4.5 (50 reviews)

AI Native

Execute product security workflows with AI agents

Est 2020|Valuation $100M|Raised $46.7M|10 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 6K|Web traffic 9K|FTEs 156|HQ Boston, Massachusetts, US

MarketsApplication Security Testing (AST)Code Security

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where the platform may be advantageous: - For organizations operating multiple scanners, a platform that aggregates and operationalizes findings can reduce fragmentation. - For teams where the primary operational challenge is triage, prioritization, and remediation throughput rather than discovery, automation features targeted at those steps are relevant. Where competitors may be stronger: - Vendors such as Snyk or Mend may be preferable when buyers want a single vendor that provides deep, native scanning capabilities across SCA/SAST/container contexts with established enterprise controls. - GitHub Security is a strong option for organizations that keep their development lifecycle centered on GitHub and prefer integrated scanning and secret scanning capabilities. - Wiz and other CNAPP vendors provide more extensive cloud posture and runtime visibility; Jit is positioned to integrate with such tools rather than replace them in cloud security roles. Pricing comparison considerations: - The vendor’s published per-developer rate can exceed certain GitHub add-on costs depending on active committer counts and existing entitlements. Other vendors such as Wiz do not publish list pricing and operate on a quote basis.

	Jit (jit.io)	Snyk	GitHub Security (Secret Protection + Code Security)
Starting Price	Per-developer pricing, billed annually; Enterprise custom; DAST priced separately	Pricing is plan-based; public pages describe tiers but no single per-developer listing	GitHub add-ons are typically priced per active committer; published pricing bands exist for advanced features
Best For	Teams seeking orchestration, contextual prioritization, and automation across multiple scanning tools and workflows	Teams seeking a single vendor with integrated SCA/SAST/container scanning and remediation	Organizations standardized on GitHub that want integrated scanning and secret protection within the GitHub platform
Key Strength	Consolidation and context-based prioritization; automation features aimed at reducing manual triage work	Broad set of native scanning and remediation features with wide adoption	Native GitHub integration and procurement simplicity for organizations already on GitHub
Key Weakness	Reported gaps: advanced documentation/configuration, integration breadth, reporting depth; vendor automation claims require validation in procurement	Can be costly at scale and may overlap with other toolchains	Primarily GitHub-centric; broader code-to-cloud orchestration requires additional tooling

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where the platform may be advantageous:

For organizations operating multiple scanners, a platform that aggregates and operationalizes findings can reduce fragmentation.
For teams where the primary operational challenge is triage, prioritization, and remediation throughput rather than discovery, automation features targeted at those steps are relevant.

Where competitors may be stronger:

Vendors such as Snyk or Mend may be preferable when buyers want a single vendor that provides deep, native scanning capabilities across SCA/SAST/container contexts with established enterprise controls.
GitHub Security is a strong option for organizations that keep their development lifecycle centered on GitHub and prefer integrated scanning and secret scanning capabilities.
Wiz and other CNAPP vendors provide more extensive cloud posture and runtime visibility; Jit is positioned to integrate with such tools rather than replace them in cloud security roles.

Pricing comparison considerations:

The vendor’s published per-developer rate can exceed certain GitHub add-on costs depending on active committer counts and existing entitlements. Other vendors such as Wiz do not publish list pricing and operate on a quote basis.

	Jit (jit.io)	Snyk	GitHub Security (Secret Protection + Code Security)
Starting Price	Per-developer pricing, billed annually; Enterprise custom; DAST priced separately	Pricing is plan-based; public pages describe tiers but no single per-developer listing	GitHub add-ons are typically priced per active committer; published pricing bands exist for advanced features
Best For	Teams seeking orchestration, contextual prioritization, and automation across multiple scanning tools and workflows	Teams seeking a single vendor with integrated SCA/SAST/container scanning and remediation	Organizations standardized on GitHub that want integrated scanning and secret protection within the GitHub platform
Key Strength	Consolidation and context-based prioritization; automation features aimed at reducing manual triage work	Broad set of native scanning and remediation features with wide adoption	Native GitHub integration and procurement simplicity for organizations already on GitHub
Key Weakness	Reported gaps: advanced documentation/configuration, integration breadth, reporting depth; vendor automation claims require validation in procurement	Can be costly at scale and may overlap with other toolchains	Primarily GitHub-centric; broader code-to-cloud orchestration requires additional tooling