Keenable

Name: Keenable
Brand: Keenable

AI Native

Keenable is a B2B web search and web content access infrastructure product that provides programmatic Search and fetch APIs, a point-in-time "Time Machine" query capability, and an independent web index with throughput-oriented pricing for AI agents and research teams.

Est 2025|Valuation $103M|3 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 89|Website|FTEs 6|HQ Los Angeles, CA

Published Oct 15, 2026

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | Keenable | Exa | You.com Web Search API | |--------|----------|-----|------------------------| | Starting Price | - Agent Builder Tier: Published pay-as-you-go per-request pricing - Frontier Tier: Published discounted per-request pricing for high-throughput tiers | - Exa API pricing lists base per-request prices varying by plan; public pricing is often higher than Keenable’s builder-tier pricing | - You.com published per-request pricing for the Web Search API and separate per-page extraction pricing for the Contents API (per vendor materials) | | Most Appropriate For | - Teams building agent systems that require high-frequency, low-latency web retrieval primitives - AI labs and inference providers seeking dedicated capacity and on-premises options | - Teams needing strong semantic retrieval, especially where Exa’s benchmarks show relative strength (for example, publications-style retrieval) | - Teams seeking a productized search platform with optional higher-level research-oriented endpoints | | Key Strength | - Vendor-stated low-latency targets (competitive p95 in major regions) - Scale-oriented pricing at high-throughput tiers - Time-aware retrieval primitive (point-in-time queries) | - Public benchmarks indicate strong performance in some semantic retrieval categories (for example, publications retrieval) | - Clear public pricing and a broader platform that includes higher-level research endpoints and answer-oriented features | | Key Weakness | - Limited mainstream review coverage (G2/TrustRadius/Gartner) - Security/compliance attestations are not publicly documented in accessible sources - Early-stage vendor risk | - Often higher per-query pricing than Keenable’s published builder tier; costs may be higher depending on usage and content extraction patterns | - Public list pricing for some endpoints is higher than Keenable’s builder tier and notably higher than Keenable’s advertised high-throughput tier | - Narrative analysis - The vendor’s positioning emphasizes infrastructure primitives for agent ecosystems, with an emphasis on supporting high query volumes and on providing point-in-time retrieval capabilities. - Competitors’ differentiators - Exa has public claims and benchmark results that indicate strengths in some semantic and publications-style retrieval tasks. - You.com positions a broader set of capabilities including a Research API that returns multi-step, cited answers in addition to raw search. - Brave emphasizes independence and provides both search and context-style outputs, with pricing competitive in the web-search-for-AI space. - Pricing comparison (public list prices, not negotiated) - Keenable - Published pay-as-you-go pricing and discounted high-throughput pricing are positioned below many publicly listed prices for comparable endpoints. - You.com - Published web-search and page-extraction pricing is higher than Keenable’s builder tier and higher than Keenable’s advertised high-throughput tier. - Exa - Public pricing for some plans lists higher base per-request rates than Keenable’s published builder tier. - Customer testimonials comparing products - No public, third-party testimonials stating explicit provider switches were found in conventional review venues during this research pass.

02Market Map

—

Published Oct 15, 2026

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	Keenable	Exa	You.com Web Search API
Starting Price	- Agent Builder Tier: Published pay-as-you-go per-request pricing

Frontier Tier: Published discounted per-request pricing for high-throughput tiers | - Exa API pricing lists base per-request prices varying by plan; public pricing is often higher than Keenable’s builder-tier pricing | - You.com published per-request pricing for the Web Search API and separate per-page extraction pricing for the Contents API (per vendor materials) | | Most Appropriate For | - Teams building agent systems that require high-frequency, low-latency web retrieval primitives
AI labs and inference providers seeking dedicated capacity and on-premises options | - Teams needing strong semantic retrieval, especially where Exa’s benchmarks show relative strength (for example, publications-style retrieval) | - Teams seeking a productized search platform with optional higher-level research-oriented endpoints | | Key Strength | - Vendor-stated low-latency targets (competitive p95 in major regions)
Scale-oriented pricing at high-throughput tiers
Time-aware retrieval primitive (point-in-time queries) | - Public benchmarks indicate strong performance in some semantic retrieval categories (for example, publications retrieval) | - Clear public pricing and a broader platform that includes higher-level research endpoints and answer-oriented features | | Key Weakness | - Limited mainstream review coverage (G2/TrustRadius/Gartner)
Security/compliance attestations are not publicly documented in accessible sources
Early-stage vendor risk | - Often higher per-query pricing than Keenable’s published builder tier; costs may be higher depending on usage and content extraction patterns | - Public list pricing for some endpoints is higher than Keenable’s builder tier and notably higher than Keenable’s advertised high-throughput tier |
Narrative analysis
- The vendor’s positioning emphasizes infrastructure primitives for agent ecosystems, with an emphasis on supporting high query volumes and on providing point-in-time retrieval capabilities.
- Competitors’ differentiators
  - Exa has public claims and benchmark results that indicate strengths in some semantic and publications-style retrieval tasks.
  - You.com positions a broader set of capabilities including a Research API that returns multi-step, cited answers in addition to raw search.
  - Brave emphasizes independence and provides both search and context-style outputs, with pricing competitive in the web-search-for-AI space.
- Pricing comparison (public list prices, not negotiated)
  - Keenable
    - Published pay-as-you-go pricing and discounted high-throughput pricing are positioned below many publicly listed prices for comparable endpoints.
  - You.com
    - Published web-search and page-extraction pricing is higher than Keenable’s builder tier and higher than Keenable’s advertised high-throughput tier.
  - Exa
    - Public pricing for some plans lists higher base per-request rates than Keenable’s published builder tier.
- Customer testimonials comparing products
  - No public, third-party testimonials stating explicit provider switches were found in conventional review venues during this research pass.

02Market Map

—

Aspect	Keenable	Exa	You.com Web Search API
Starting Price	- Agent Builder Tier: Published pay-as-you-go per-request pricing

Frontier Tier: Published discounted per-request pricing for high-throughput tiers | - Exa API pricing lists base per-request prices varying by plan; public pricing is often higher than Keenable’s builder-tier pricing | - You.com published per-request pricing for the Web Search API and separate per-page extraction pricing for the Contents API (per vendor materials) | | Most Appropriate For | - Teams building agent systems that require high-frequency, low-latency web retrieval primitives
AI labs and inference providers seeking dedicated capacity and on-premises options | - Teams needing strong semantic retrieval, especially where Exa’s benchmarks show relative strength (for example, publications-style retrieval) | - Teams seeking a productized search platform with optional higher-level research-oriented endpoints | | Key Strength | - Vendor-stated low-latency targets (competitive p95 in major regions)
Scale-oriented pricing at high-throughput tiers
Time-aware retrieval primitive (point-in-time queries) | - Public benchmarks indicate strong performance in some semantic retrieval categories (for example, publications retrieval) | - Clear public pricing and a broader platform that includes higher-level research endpoints and answer-oriented features | | Key Weakness | - Limited mainstream review coverage (G2/TrustRadius/Gartner)
Security/compliance attestations are not publicly documented in accessible sources
Early-stage vendor risk | - Often higher per-query pricing than Keenable’s published builder tier; costs may be higher depending on usage and content extraction patterns | - Public list pricing for some endpoints is higher than Keenable’s builder tier and notably higher than Keenable’s advertised high-throughput tier |
Narrative analysis
- The vendor’s positioning emphasizes infrastructure primitives for agent ecosystems, with an emphasis on supporting high query volumes and on providing point-in-time retrieval capabilities.
- Competitors’ differentiators
  - Exa has public claims and benchmark results that indicate strengths in some semantic and publications-style retrieval tasks.
  - You.com positions a broader set of capabilities including a Research API that returns multi-step, cited answers in addition to raw search.
  - Brave emphasizes independence and provides both search and context-style outputs, with pricing competitive in the web-search-for-AI space.
- Pricing comparison (public list prices, not negotiated)
  - Keenable
    - Published pay-as-you-go pricing and discounted high-throughput pricing are positioned below many publicly listed prices for comparable endpoints.
  - You.com
    - Published web-search and page-extraction pricing is higher than Keenable’s builder tier and higher than Keenable’s advertised high-throughput tier.
  - Exa
    - Public pricing for some plans lists higher base per-request rates than Keenable’s published builder tier.
- Customer testimonials comparing products
  - No public, third-party testimonials stating explicit provider switches were found in conventional review venues during this research pass.