KERYS Software

Name: KERYS Software
Brand: KERYS Software

AI Native

Unifiez vos postes, boostez vos performances IT – La virtualisation sécurisée pensée pour les DSI et RSSI

Est 2024|Valuation $29.5M|Raised $7.2M|5 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 1K|Website|FTEs 19|HQ Palaiseau, Île-de-France, FR

MarketsEndpoint Security (EPP/EDR)

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | KERYS YS::Desktop | Citrix DaaS / Virtual Apps & Desktops | HP Sure Click Enterprise / Wolf Security (isolation) | |--------|-------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------| | Starting Price | Not publicly listed | Public pricing varies; published price points exist for lower tiers but enterprise pricing is scenario-dependent | Not consistently published in a single global list; often sold via enterprise agreements or region-specific pricing | | Suitable For | Users needing multiple local isolated environments and offline operation; workstation segmentation use cases | Centralized virtual desktops/apps; remote access and large-scale VDI operations | Containing risky tasks (browser/docs) via micro-VM isolation; complements endpoint protection | | Key Strength | Local/offline operation; vendor claims of VM isolation and predictable performance | Mature ecosystem, admin tooling, and broad compatibility | Established containment model for specific threat vectors; integration with endpoint security programs | | Key Weakness | Limited independent reviews; certifications not clearly documented; likely higher hardware requirements; enterprise manageability maturity unclear | Complexity, infrastructure cost, licensing variability, and user-experience issues are commonly cited in market discussions | Typically focuses on isolating specific tasks rather than delivering full multi-domain workstation environments; may not meet multi-level workstation segmentation requirements | - Narrative analysis - KERYS vs VDI (Citrix/AVD/Horizon) - KERYS differentiates on a local-first, offline-capable segmentation model, while VDI solutions emphasize centralization and remote delivery. - For users who are frequently offline, latency-sensitive, or require specialized peripherals or direct GPU access, local virtualization can be attractive. - For requirements centered on centralized control, remote access, or rapid provisioning at scale, VDI solutions may remain preferable. - KERYS vs endpoint micro-virtualization (HP Sure Click/Bromium lineage) - HP Sure Click and similar products isolate untrusted content or tasks using micro-VMs, typically focused on browser or document containment rather than full multi-environment workstations. - KERYS targets broader multi-environment workstation separation with device and network controls.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	KERYS YS::Desktop	Citrix DaaS / Virtual Apps & Desktops	HP Sure Click Enterprise / Wolf Security (isolation)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed	Public pricing varies; published price points exist for lower tiers but enterprise pricing is scenario-dependent	Not consistently published in a single global list; often sold via enterprise agreements or region-specific pricing
Suitable For	Users needing multiple local isolated environments and offline operation; workstation segmentation use cases	Centralized virtual desktops/apps; remote access and large-scale VDI operations	Containing risky tasks (browser/docs) via micro-VM isolation; complements endpoint protection
Key Strength	Local/offline operation; vendor claims of VM isolation and predictable performance	Mature ecosystem, admin tooling, and broad compatibility	Established containment model for specific threat vectors; integration with endpoint security programs
Key Weakness	Limited independent reviews; certifications not clearly documented; likely higher hardware requirements; enterprise manageability maturity unclear	Complexity, infrastructure cost, licensing variability, and user-experience issues are commonly cited in market discussions	Typically focuses on isolating specific tasks rather than delivering full multi-domain workstation environments; may not meet multi-level workstation segmentation requirements

Narrative analysis
- KERYS vs VDI (Citrix/AVD/Horizon)
  - KERYS differentiates on a local-first, offline-capable segmentation model, while VDI solutions emphasize centralization and remote delivery.
  - For users who are frequently offline, latency-sensitive, or require specialized peripherals or direct GPU access, local virtualization can be attractive.
  - For requirements centered on centralized control, remote access, or rapid provisioning at scale, VDI solutions may remain preferable.
- KERYS vs endpoint micro-virtualization (HP Sure Click/Bromium lineage)
  - HP Sure Click and similar products isolate untrusted content or tasks using micro-VMs, typically focused on browser or document containment rather than full multi-environment workstations.
  - KERYS targets broader multi-environment workstation separation with device and network controls.

Aspect

KERYS YS::Desktop

Citrix DaaS / Virtual Apps & Desktops

HP Sure Click Enterprise / Wolf Security (isolation)

Starting Price

Not publicly listed

Public pricing varies; published price points exist for lower tiers but enterprise pricing is scenario-dependent

Not consistently published in a single global list; often sold via enterprise agreements or region-specific pricing

Suitable For

Users needing multiple local isolated environments and offline operation; workstation segmentation use cases

Centralized virtual desktops/apps; remote access and large-scale VDI operations

Containing risky tasks (browser/docs) via micro-VM isolation; complements endpoint protection

Key Strength

Local/offline operation; vendor claims of VM isolation and predictable performance

Mature ecosystem, admin tooling, and broad compatibility

Established containment model for specific threat vectors; integration with endpoint security programs

Key Weakness

Limited independent reviews; certifications not clearly documented; likely higher hardware requirements; enterprise manageability maturity unclear

Complexity, infrastructure cost, licensing variability, and user-experience issues are commonly cited in market discussions

Typically focuses on isolating specific tasks rather than delivering full multi-domain workstation environments; may not meet multi-level workstation segmentation requirements