Krane

Name: Krane
Brand: Trane Technologies

Leader

End-to-End AI Supply Chain Management Platform for Construction.

Est 1885|Valuation $90.8B|Raised $1.3M|9 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 280K|Website|Web traffic 271K|FTEs 15,337|HQ Davidson, North Carolina, US

MarketsProduction Planning Supply Chain Visibility Materials Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Krane vs Procore/Autodesk Build: Krane is positioned as a specialized supply-chain execution layer that integrates with larger platforms. For organizations already using Procore/Autodesk, the evaluation question is whether Krane provides net-new capability (e.g., delivery accuracy, lead-time-driven scheduling, cross-project search) without duplicating existing workflows. - Krane vs Kojo: Kojo is focused on procurement workflows and supplier pricing; Krane emphasizes execution visibility (delivery/logistics/schedule alignment).

Market share and adoption trends

No reliable public market share data was found for Krane specifically. Industry signals indicate major platforms such as Procore and BuildingConnected have significant awareness and adoption; Krane appears to be at an earlier stage.

When customers choose competitors instead (and why)

Procore/Autodesk: selected when an organization needs an end-to-end platform that may be mandated by owners or corporate standards.
Kojo: selected when procurement governance, supplier pricing, and purchasing controls are the primary pain points.
Primavera P6: selected when detailed CPM scheduling is the core requirement and supply chain is managed by process rather than a dedicated tool.

	Krane (vendor website)	Kojo (vendor website)	Procore (vendor website)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based likely)	Public pricing page exists; confirm package details	Typically quote-based; commonly perceived as relatively expensive in community commentary
Best For	Materials/logistics execution layer and search/agents tied to schedule risk	Procurement workflows, vendor catalogs and purchasing controls	Broad construction PM platform (RFIs, submittals, documents, financials) with a large ecosystem
Key Strength	Focus on supply chain execution and delivery/logistics visibility; vendor lists integrations with major PM tools	Procurement focus with vendor catalog and price list workflows	Widely used system of record with a broad ecosystem and marketplace
Key Weakness	Limited independent reviews; unclear public pricing; vendor-stated outcomes require validation	May be more procurement-centric than delivery execution-focused	Cost and adoption challenges are frequently discussed; can be substantial for smaller firms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Krane vs Procore/Autodesk Build: Krane is positioned as a specialized supply-chain execution layer that integrates with larger platforms. For organizations already using Procore/Autodesk, the evaluation question is whether Krane provides net-new capability (e.g., delivery accuracy, lead-time-driven scheduling, cross-project search) without duplicating existing workflows.
Krane vs Kojo: Kojo is focused on procurement workflows and supplier pricing; Krane emphasizes execution visibility (delivery/logistics/schedule alignment).

Market share and adoption trends

When customers choose competitors instead (and why)

Procore/Autodesk: selected when an organization needs an end-to-end platform that may be mandated by owners or corporate standards.
Kojo: selected when procurement governance, supplier pricing, and purchasing controls are the primary pain points.
Primavera P6: selected when detailed CPM scheduling is the core requirement and supply chain is managed by process rather than a dedicated tool.

	Krane (vendor website)	Kojo (vendor website)	Procore (vendor website)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based likely)	Public pricing page exists; confirm package details	Typically quote-based; commonly perceived as relatively expensive in community commentary
Best For	Materials/logistics execution layer and search/agents tied to schedule risk	Procurement workflows, vendor catalogs and purchasing controls	Broad construction PM platform (RFIs, submittals, documents, financials) with a large ecosystem
Key Strength	Focus on supply chain execution and delivery/logistics visibility; vendor lists integrations with major PM tools	Procurement focus with vendor catalog and price list workflows	Widely used system of record with a broad ecosystem and marketplace
Key Weakness	Limited independent reviews; unclear public pricing; vendor-stated outcomes require validation	May be more procurement-centric than delivery execution-focused	Cost and adoption challenges are frequently discussed; can be substantial for smaller firms