Kryon

Name: Kryon
Brand: Kryon

Find us on the Nintex LinkedIn channel, focusing on process management, optimization and automation.

Est 2008|Valuation $100M|Raised $65.3M

LinkedIn 19K|Website|FTEs 150|HQ Bellevue, Washington, US

MarketsBusiness Process Management (BPM)Workflow Automation

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- UiPath exhibits a larger market presence, community size, and partner network than smaller vendors; this typically affects available third-party resources, talent supply, and community-driven problem-solving. - Peer-review engagement indicators suggest UiPath has greater mindshare in many markets; such engagement metrics are not a direct measure of market share but align with broader perceptions of platform scale. - Kryon/Nintex differentiation: Organizations whose automation programs benefit from integrated process discovery and rapid ideation-to-automation workflows may find the Kryon-origin capabilities relevant; however, Microsoft and UiPath also provide process/task mining and discovery products, and buyers should compare functionality and integration models across vendors.

	Kryon (now under Nintex)	UiPath	Microsoft Power Automate (RPA)
Starting Price	Typically quote-based / bundled; public Kryon pricing is unclear post-acquisition	Public starting points are published on software directories (examples exist in public pricing snapshots)	Often packaged within Microsoft Power Platform; pricing varies by per-user/per-flow and by enterprise licensing agreements
Typical fit	Teams seeking process discovery integrated with UI-based automation within a broader Nintex automation strategy	Broad enterprise RPA platform with a large community, marketplace, and extensive orchestration capabilities	Organizations standardizing on Microsoft 365/Power Platform seeking tight integration with Microsoft services
Key strength	Process discovery heritage; emphasis on discover-to-automate workflow and ease of initial adoption reported by some users	Ecosystem scale, community, and a broad partner network	Integration with Microsoft ecosystem and potential licensing leverage for Microsoft customers
Key weakness	Smaller community relative to larger competitors; public review reports include stability and performance complaints; brand and packaging transition following acquisition may introduce roadmap uncertainty	Licensing complexity and potential cost at scale	May be less capable for some complex enterprise RPA scenarios compared with specialized RPA platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

UiPath exhibits a larger market presence, community size, and partner network than smaller vendors; this typically affects available third-party resources, talent supply, and community-driven problem-solving.
Peer-review engagement indicators suggest UiPath has greater mindshare in many markets; such engagement metrics are not a direct measure of market share but align with broader perceptions of platform scale.
Kryon/Nintex differentiation: Organizations whose automation programs benefit from integrated process discovery and rapid ideation-to-automation workflows may find the Kryon-origin capabilities relevant; however, Microsoft and UiPath also provide process/task mining and discovery products, and buyers should compare functionality and integration models across vendors.

	Kryon (now under Nintex)	UiPath	Microsoft Power Automate (RPA)
Starting Price	Typically quote-based / bundled; public Kryon pricing is unclear post-acquisition	Public starting points are published on software directories (examples exist in public pricing snapshots)	Often packaged within Microsoft Power Platform; pricing varies by per-user/per-flow and by enterprise licensing agreements
Typical fit	Teams seeking process discovery integrated with UI-based automation within a broader Nintex automation strategy	Broad enterprise RPA platform with a large community, marketplace, and extensive orchestration capabilities	Organizations standardizing on Microsoft 365/Power Platform seeking tight integration with Microsoft services
Key strength	Process discovery heritage; emphasis on discover-to-automate workflow and ease of initial adoption reported by some users	Ecosystem scale, community, and a broad partner network	Integration with Microsoft ecosystem and potential licensing leverage for Microsoft customers
Key weakness	Smaller community relative to larger competitors; public review reports include stability and performance complaints; brand and packaging transition following acquisition may introduce roadmap uncertainty	Licensing complexity and potential cost at scale	May be less capable for some complex enterprise RPA scenarios compared with specialized RPA platforms