Kuebix

Name: Kuebix
Brand: Kuebix
Rating: 4.6 (155 reviews)

TMS built for scale.

Est 2008|Valuation $201.1M|Raised $13.9M|65 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 4K|Web traffic 2K|FTEs 52|HQ Brentwood, Tennessee, US

MarketsFreight Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Kuebix vs Freightview - Pricing and procurement: Freightview’s pricing has historically been positioned as transparent and includes a trial option; Kuebix now publishes transparent SMB tiers under current ownership, while enterprise pricing remains vendor-negotiated. - Ease-of-use: Both vendors market simplicity. Kuebix reviews often note ease-of-use for basic workflows, while some reviews cite an uneven experience for more complex use cases. - Tracking: Some Kuebix reviewers report tracking unreliability; this analysis did not assemble a matched sample of Freightview reviews for a detailed comparative analysis. Kuebix vs MercuryGate - Implementation intensity: MercuryGate is generally perceived in the market as targeted at enterprise operations and may require more structured training and enablement. Kuebix is positioned to support faster onboarding for simpler workflows with modular expansion available as needs grow. Market-positioning signals - The vendor has referenced analyst recognition in past materials. Vendor press pages reflect the vendor’s framing; underlying analyst reports should be accessed directly for independent evaluation.

	Kuebix	Freightview	MercuryGate
Starting Price	Entry SMB monthly tier (single user, single location, limited quotes)	Low-to-mid-hundreds per month tier for low shipment volumes	Public licensing not clearly published (typical enterprise quote); training subscriptions shown separately
Best For	Shippers seeking carrier connectivity plus TMS workflows; SMB-to-midmarket scaling	SMB-to-midmarket shippers seeking simplicity and transparent pricing	Larger, more complex transportation networks needing enterprise-oriented configurability
Key Strength	Modular carrier connectivity; API + multiple integration protocols; published SMB entry offering	Transparent pricing and straightforward positioning with an available trial offering	Broad enterprise feature set and complex network support (market perception)
Key Weakness	Review complaints about tracking reliability and workflow rigidity (locked fields, broker workflows); public security documentation limited	May be less suitable for very complex enterprise workflows (depends on needs)	Higher implementation effort and cost; pricing typically negotiated

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Kuebix vs Freightview

Pricing and procurement: Freightview’s pricing has historically been positioned as transparent and includes a trial option; Kuebix now publishes transparent SMB tiers under current ownership, while enterprise pricing remains vendor-negotiated.
Ease-of-use: Both vendors market simplicity. Kuebix reviews often note ease-of-use for basic workflows, while some reviews cite an uneven experience for more complex use cases.
Tracking: Some Kuebix reviewers report tracking unreliability; this analysis did not assemble a matched sample of Freightview reviews for a detailed comparative analysis.

Kuebix vs MercuryGate

Implementation intensity: MercuryGate is generally perceived in the market as targeted at enterprise operations and may require more structured training and enablement. Kuebix is positioned to support faster onboarding for simpler workflows with modular expansion available as needs grow.

Market-positioning signals

The vendor has referenced analyst recognition in past materials. Vendor press pages reflect the vendor’s framing; underlying analyst reports should be accessed directly for independent evaluation.

	Kuebix	Freightview	MercuryGate
Starting Price	Entry SMB monthly tier (single user, single location, limited quotes)	Low-to-mid-hundreds per month tier for low shipment volumes	Public licensing not clearly published (typical enterprise quote); training subscriptions shown separately
Best For	Shippers seeking carrier connectivity plus TMS workflows; SMB-to-midmarket scaling	SMB-to-midmarket shippers seeking simplicity and transparent pricing	Larger, more complex transportation networks needing enterprise-oriented configurability
Key Strength	Modular carrier connectivity; API + multiple integration protocols; published SMB entry offering	Transparent pricing and straightforward positioning with an available trial offering	Broad enterprise feature set and complex network support (market perception)
Key Weakness	Review complaints about tracking reliability and workflow rigidity (locked fields, broker workflows); public security documentation limited	May be less suitable for very complex enterprise workflows (depends on needs)	Higher implementation effort and cost; pricing typically negotiated