Labric
The data layer for scientific research
Est 2012|Raised $500K
Published Jul 15, 2026
| Starting Price | Not publicly listed; pilot/contact-sales engagement model | Published pricing information available for some plans; enterprise pricing often requires vendor engagement | Frequently sold via institutional/site licenses; enterprise pricing often requires vendor engagement |
| Best Fit | Labs seeking instrument/file capture that are moving toward a centralized, queryable data foundation with automation and AI layers | Biotech and life-science R&D teams needing integrated ELN, registries, and workflows | Academic institutions and multidisciplinary groups needing ELN and collaboration tools |
| Key Strength | Emphasis on instrument/file streaming, structured data, and event-driven automation (vendor statements) | Mature platform with broad ELN/registry ecosystem and wide industry adoption | Established presence in academia; institutional procurement pathways and familiarity with academic workflows |
| Key Weakness | Early-stage with a limited public review footprint; security certifications appear to be incomplete or in progress; enterprise controls and pricing clarity are limited | Community reports of high cost and fit challenges for some lab types; can be expensive at scale | May not prioritize data-platform/automation-first workflows compared with newer entrants |
—
Where Labric may provide advantage (contingent on delivery and validation):
Where established competitors may have an advantage:
Market trend note: The category is moving toward applying AI in scientific contexts, but independent analyses indicate AI effectiveness depends on structured, accessible, and governed data—an observation that aligns with Labric's stated positioning but does not validate the vendor's specific implementation.