Lanes & Planes

Name: Lanes & Planes
Brand: Lanes & Planes
Rating: 4.6 (989 reviews)

The all-in-one solution for business travel

Est 2017|Valuation $19.9M|Raised $45M

LinkedIn 8K|Website|Web traffic 88K|FTEs 240|HQ Munich, Bavaria, DE

MarketsExpense Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Versus Navan: Navan markets entry-level pricing for small organizations; buyers should compare total cost and service coverage for their travel mix. Competitor marketing claims should be validated independently. - Versus SAP Concur: SAP Concur targets large enterprises with deep finance and ERP integrations. Concur may offer a broader integration ecosystem, while modern platforms like Lanes & Planes target mid-market customers seeking improved usability and service. Concur's usability and support experiences are commonly discussed in community forums as mixed, which creates an opportunity for alternative vendors in the mid-market.

Market share and adoption trend signals

Recent financing activity and press coverage indicate investor interest and growth activity in the EU corporate travel SaaS segment.
Review portal activity provides user feedback data, but volumes and syndication should be interpreted carefully during vendor evaluation.

	Lanes & Planes	TravelPerk / Perk	Navan
Starting Price	Not consistently public (quote-based)	Public plan framework available (varies by region)	Public entry-level options exist with constraints and add-ons
Typical fit	EU-centric firms seeking consolidated travel + expense with German hosting/data residency and in-house support	Organizations wanting packaged plans and broad travel management capabilities	Companies seeking entry-level pricing and modern UX; often attractive to fast-growing SMBs
Noted strengths	German data residency emphasis and ISO 27001 certification; reviewer feedback highlights support responsiveness	Packaged plans and market visibility; broad travel management focus	Simple entry for smaller companies and active marketing of entry-level options
Noted weaknesses	Limited public pricing transparency; some UX and booking edge cases; certain enterprise artifacts (SOC 2, SCIM) not publicly documented	Some advanced features reserved for higher tiers; market coverage varies by region	Debate over pricing/value and inventory sourcing compared to direct booking or larger incumbents

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Versus Navan: Navan markets entry-level pricing for small organizations; buyers should compare total cost and service coverage for their travel mix. Competitor marketing claims should be validated independently.
Versus SAP Concur: SAP Concur targets large enterprises with deep finance and ERP integrations. Concur may offer a broader integration ecosystem, while modern platforms like Lanes & Planes target mid-market customers seeking improved usability and service. Concur's usability and support experiences are commonly discussed in community forums as mixed, which creates an opportunity for alternative vendors in the mid-market.

Market share and adoption trend signals

Recent financing activity and press coverage indicate investor interest and growth activity in the EU corporate travel SaaS segment.
Review portal activity provides user feedback data, but volumes and syndication should be interpreted carefully during vendor evaluation.

	Lanes & Planes	TravelPerk / Perk	Navan
Starting Price	Not consistently public (quote-based)	Public plan framework available (varies by region)	Public entry-level options exist with constraints and add-ons
Typical fit	EU-centric firms seeking consolidated travel + expense with German hosting/data residency and in-house support	Organizations wanting packaged plans and broad travel management capabilities	Companies seeking entry-level pricing and modern UX; often attractive to fast-growing SMBs
Noted strengths	German data residency emphasis and ISO 27001 certification; reviewer feedback highlights support responsiveness	Packaged plans and market visibility; broad travel management focus	Simple entry for smaller companies and active marketing of entry-level options
Noted weaknesses	Limited public pricing transparency; some UX and booking edge cases; certain enterprise artifacts (SOC 2, SCIM) not publicly documented	Some advanced features reserved for higher tiers; market coverage varies by region	Debate over pricing/value and inventory sourcing compared to direct booking or larger incumbents