Last.app

Name: Last.app
Brand: Last.app
Rating: 4.4 (24 reviews)

All-in-one restaurant POS software. Simple, technological and complete.

Est 2019

LinkedIn 6K|Web traffic 252K|FTEs 65|HQ Barcelona, Catalonia, ES

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Last.app appears to offer advantages: - Integration-focused approach with a hub concept and a public API and webhooks. - Hardware flexibility across multiple operating systems rather than a single-device dependency. - Visible update cadence on the vendor site and changelog entries. Where competitors may be stronger: - Deep legacy restaurant workflows and advanced menu/configuration capabilities in some traditional POS vendors. - Broader independent review coverage and referenceability for larger incumbents (Square/Toast/Lightspeed/Revo). - Greater security/compliance transparency from larger vendors, where SOC2/ISO documentation and security whitepapers are often published. Competitive fit observation: - When decisions hinge on reservations reliability and edge cases (time zones, capacity logic, Google Bookings), the negative narratives from consumer review sites merit validation through a pilot or reference checks. - When the primary priority is a payments-led ecosystem with a low-friction entry point, other vendors with entry-level or free tiers in supported markets may be more economical.

	Last.app	Glop TPV	Square for Restaurants
Starting Price	Published per-location pricing available from the vendor	Vendor-promoted low-cost starting subscription on its site; final price depends on modules, hardware, and distributor	Published entry-level (including a free tier in some regions) and paid tiers available from the vendor; add-on fees apply depending on market
Primary fit	Spain/EU restaurants seeking a modular cloud platform with multiple integrations and hardware flexibility	Spain businesses preferring traditional/distributor support and Windows-centric deployments	Restaurants in markets supported by the vendor seeking an integrated payments + POS ecosystem and low-friction entry
Key Strength	Modular architecture + public API; hardware agnostic; subscription includes updates; delivery hub + integrations	Established presence in Spain, distributor network; options for different budgets	Low-friction entry and broad ecosystem; established onboarding and mainstream familiarity
Key Weakness	Reported pricing transparency concerns; some reviews report reservations reliability issues; limited public security posture	May present more classic UI/Windows patterns; cloud add-ons may be extra; distributor variability	Payments-led model can imply higher processing costs in some cases; feature depth for full-service restaurants is debated

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Last.app appears to offer advantages:

Integration-focused approach with a hub concept and a public API and webhooks.
Hardware flexibility across multiple operating systems rather than a single-device dependency.
Visible update cadence on the vendor site and changelog entries.

Where competitors may be stronger:

Deep legacy restaurant workflows and advanced menu/configuration capabilities in some traditional POS vendors.
Broader independent review coverage and referenceability for larger incumbents (Square/Toast/Lightspeed/Revo).
Greater security/compliance transparency from larger vendors, where SOC2/ISO documentation and security whitepapers are often published.

Competitive fit observation:

When decisions hinge on reservations reliability and edge cases (time zones, capacity logic, Google Bookings), the negative narratives from consumer review sites merit validation through a pilot or reference checks.
When the primary priority is a payments-led ecosystem with a low-friction entry point, other vendors with entry-level or free tiers in supported markets may be more economical.

	Last.app	Glop TPV	Square for Restaurants
Starting Price	Published per-location pricing available from the vendor	Vendor-promoted low-cost starting subscription on its site; final price depends on modules, hardware, and distributor	Published entry-level (including a free tier in some regions) and paid tiers available from the vendor; add-on fees apply depending on market
Primary fit	Spain/EU restaurants seeking a modular cloud platform with multiple integrations and hardware flexibility	Spain businesses preferring traditional/distributor support and Windows-centric deployments	Restaurants in markets supported by the vendor seeking an integrated payments + POS ecosystem and low-friction entry
Key Strength	Modular architecture + public API; hardware agnostic; subscription includes updates; delivery hub + integrations	Established presence in Spain, distributor network; options for different budgets	Low-friction entry and broad ecosystem; established onboarding and mainstream familiarity
Key Weakness	Reported pricing transparency concerns; some reviews report reservations reliability issues; limited public security posture	May present more classic UI/Windows patterns; cloud add-ons may be extra; distributor variability	Payments-led model can imply higher processing costs in some cases; feature depth for full-service restaurants is debated

Last.app

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map