Lattice

Name: Lattice
Brand: Lattice
Rating: 4.7 (4504 reviews)

Leader

Lattice is the leading HR Platform where People + AI succeed together.

Est 2015|Valuation $3B|Raised $330.3M|138 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 104K|Web traffic 153K|FTEs 537|HQ San Francisco, California, US

MarketsHuman Resource Information Systems (HRIS)

Platform CoversPerformance Management Objectives and Key Results (OKRs)Career Pathing & Succession Planning Employee Engagement & Survey Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | Lattice | 15Five | Culture Amp | |--------|--------|--------|-------------| | Starting Price | Published per-user pricing for core Performance + OKRs; additional modules incur extra per-user fees published by the vendor | Published per-user pricing available for Engage and Perform bundles; vendor publishes clearer tiered rates | Pricing typically quote-based; not publicly listed on the vendor site | | Suitable For | Structured performance cycles, OKRs, and connected talent workflows (commonly mid-market) | Manager effectiveness, performance, and engagement bundles with clearer published tiers | Engagement surveys, benchmarking, and people-science-driven survey programs | | Key Strength | Integrated workflows connecting reviews, calibration views, development, and compensation planning | Transparent tiering and manager-centric approach | Depth of engagement science, templates, and benchmarking capabilities | | Key Weakness | Costs can increase with multiple modules; some users report UI clutter and customization limits | Not positioned as a full HR infrastructure suite in the same way as Lattice; compensation planning may be less central | Pricing transparency is limited; may require more implementation effort for some organizations | - Narrative analysis - Lattice vs 15Five - 15Five publishes clearer tier pricing and bundles; Lattice’s modular approach can be flexible but can make budgeting less predictable if multiple modules are adopted. - Organizations seeking a single, predictable per-employee cost may find vendors with clearer bundle pricing simpler to budget. - Lattice vs Culture Amp - Culture Amp emphasizes engagement and people-science-driven survey programs and typically provides pricing via quote. Community discussions often describe Lattice as stronger on structured review and OKR workflows, while Culture Amp is viewed as stronger on engagement analytics and benchmarking. - Lattice vs Confirm (calibration niche) - Competitor materials suggest Confirm focuses on evidence-driven calibration features, while Lattice provides calibration process management and distribution views. These competitor-produced claims should be validated through product demonstrations and reference checks.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	Lattice	15Five	Culture Amp
Starting Price	Published per-user pricing for core Performance + OKRs; additional modules incur extra per-user fees published by the vendor	Published per-user pricing available for Engage and Perform bundles; vendor publishes clearer tiered rates	Pricing typically quote-based; not publicly listed on the vendor site
Suitable For	Structured performance cycles, OKRs, and connected talent workflows (commonly mid-market)	Manager effectiveness, performance, and engagement bundles with clearer published tiers	Engagement surveys, benchmarking, and people-science-driven survey programs
Key Strength	Integrated workflows connecting reviews, calibration views, development, and compensation planning	Transparent tiering and manager-centric approach	Depth of engagement science, templates, and benchmarking capabilities
Key Weakness	Costs can increase with multiple modules; some users report UI clutter and customization limits	Not positioned as a full HR infrastructure suite in the same way as Lattice; compensation planning may be less central	Pricing transparency is limited; may require more implementation effort for some organizations

Narrative analysis
- Lattice vs 15Five
  - 15Five publishes clearer tier pricing and bundles; Lattice’s modular approach can be flexible but can make budgeting less predictable if multiple modules are adopted.
  - Organizations seeking a single, predictable per-employee cost may find vendors with clearer bundle pricing simpler to budget.
- Lattice vs Culture Amp
  - Culture Amp emphasizes engagement and people-science-driven survey programs and typically provides pricing via quote. Community discussions often describe Lattice as stronger on structured review and OKR workflows, while Culture Amp is viewed as stronger on engagement analytics and benchmarking.
- Lattice vs Confirm (calibration niche)
  - Competitor materials suggest Confirm focuses on evidence-driven calibration features, while Lattice provides calibration process management and distribution views. These competitor-produced claims should be validated through product demonstrations and reference checks.

Aspect

Lattice

15Five

Culture Amp

Starting Price

Published per-user pricing for core Performance + OKRs; additional modules incur extra per-user fees published by the vendor

Published per-user pricing available for Engage and Perform bundles; vendor publishes clearer tiered rates

Pricing typically quote-based; not publicly listed on the vendor site

Suitable For

Structured performance cycles, OKRs, and connected talent workflows (commonly mid-market)

Manager effectiveness, performance, and engagement bundles with clearer published tiers

Engagement surveys, benchmarking, and people-science-driven survey programs

Key Strength

Integrated workflows connecting reviews, calibration views, development, and compensation planning

Transparent tiering and manager-centric approach

Depth of engagement science, templates, and benchmarking capabilities

Key Weakness

Costs can increase with multiple modules; some users report UI clutter and customization limits

Not positioned as a full HR infrastructure suite in the same way as Lattice; compensation planning may be less central

Pricing transparency is limited; may require more implementation effort for some organizations