Leadr

Name: Leadr
Brand: Leadr
Rating: 4.6 (26 reviews)

Purpose-built tools, coaching and frameworks that increase manager capacity boost team productivity, and reduce turnover

Est 2018|Valuation $60M|Raised $28M|16 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 8K|Web traffic 17K|FTEs 56|HQ Addison, Texas, US

MarketsPerformance Management Employee Engagement & Survey Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Leadr vs. Lattice: Lattice is commonly selected when buyers need deeper enterprise features, broader integrations, and more mature review/OKR frameworks. Leadr may be selected when buyers specifically want to operationalize manager behaviors (especially meetings) with a manager-focused user experience. - Leadr vs. 15Five: Both emphasize continuous feedback and manager effectiveness. 15Five has broader brand presence and transparent tier pricing. Leadr differentiates with meeting agenda continuity and a manager-focused product positioning. - Leadr vs. Leapsome/Culture Amp: Those platforms often appeal to HR teams building a broader people stack (engagement surveys, analytics, multiple modules, enterprise compliance). Leadr may be simpler to deploy for meeting and manager workflow improvement but may be less comprehensive for enterprise HR analytics. Market adoption signals (directional): - Review platforms list Lattice, 15Five, and Culture Amp as common alternatives. - Leadr has a smaller review footprint on public review sites than larger incumbents; this can indicate either a smaller install base or lower review collection activity.

	Leadr	Lattice	15Five
Starting Price	Per-user/month (lower rate for annual billing); minimum 5 licenses for the publicly listed manager package	Module-based per-user/month, billed annually; enterprise/minimum annual agreement applies	Tiered per-user/month pricing with separate tiers for engagement and performance
Recommended for	Organizations prioritizing meeting discipline, manager habits, and lightweight goals tracking	Organizations seeking a mature performance/OKR platform with broader integrations and enterprise purchasing models	Organizations seeking combined performance and engagement tooling with packaged pricing
Key Strength	Manager-focused workflows (1:1s, agendas, action items); quick adoption for meeting-related workflows	Broad platform maturity, integrations, modular buying; established market presence	Combined performance + engagement features with transparent tier pricing
Key Weakness	Reviewers cite limited customization in performance reviews and integration friction	Annual contracts and minimum spend can be costly for smaller organizations	Some organizations may find it narrower than HRIS suites; add-ons can increase total cost

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Leadr vs. Lattice: Lattice is commonly selected when buyers need deeper enterprise features, broader integrations, and more mature review/OKR frameworks. Leadr may be selected when buyers specifically want to operationalize manager behaviors (especially meetings) with a manager-focused user experience.
Leadr vs. 15Five: Both emphasize continuous feedback and manager effectiveness. 15Five has broader brand presence and transparent tier pricing. Leadr differentiates with meeting agenda continuity and a manager-focused product positioning.
Leadr vs. Leapsome/Culture Amp: Those platforms often appeal to HR teams building a broader people stack (engagement surveys, analytics, multiple modules, enterprise compliance). Leadr may be simpler to deploy for meeting and manager workflow improvement but may be less comprehensive for enterprise HR analytics.

Market adoption signals (directional):

Review platforms list Lattice, 15Five, and Culture Amp as common alternatives.
Leadr has a smaller review footprint on public review sites than larger incumbents; this can indicate either a smaller install base or lower review collection activity.

	Leadr	Lattice	15Five
Starting Price	Per-user/month (lower rate for annual billing); minimum 5 licenses for the publicly listed manager package	Module-based per-user/month, billed annually; enterprise/minimum annual agreement applies	Tiered per-user/month pricing with separate tiers for engagement and performance
Recommended for	Organizations prioritizing meeting discipline, manager habits, and lightweight goals tracking	Organizations seeking a mature performance/OKR platform with broader integrations and enterprise purchasing models	Organizations seeking combined performance and engagement tooling with packaged pricing
Key Strength	Manager-focused workflows (1:1s, agendas, action items); quick adoption for meeting-related workflows	Broad platform maturity, integrations, modular buying; established market presence	Combined performance + engagement features with transparent tier pricing
Key Weakness	Reviewers cite limited customization in performance reviews and integration friction	Annual contracts and minimum spend can be costly for smaller organizations	Some organizations may find it narrower than HRIS suites; add-ons can increase total cost