Leapsome

Name: Leapsome
Brand: Leapsome
Rating: 4.8 (2368 reviews)

Leader

Run everything HR with one platform for HRIS, performance & engagement.

Est 2016|Valuation $592.9M|Raised $60M|97 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 26K|Web traffic 425K|FTEs 130|HQ Berlin, Germany

MarketsPerformance Management Employee Engagement & Survey Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Leapsome vs Lattice:
- Third-party comparisons indicate Lattice may be more user-friendly and require less administrative involvement; those comparisons also note Lattice’s 1:1 functionality and OKR framework. Other third-party pages indicate Leapsome offers extensive integrations and granular review scheduling and survey visualizations. Competitor claims should be verified via demonstrations and test configurations.
Leapsome vs 15Five:
- 15Five publishes clear pricing tiers and may offer procurement speed and budget predictability advantages compared with vendors that require sales engagement to price.

- **Leapsome vs Lattice:** - Third-party comparisons indicate Lattice may be more user-friendly and require less administrative involvement; those comparisons also note Lattice’s 1:1 functionality and OKR framework. Other third-party pages indicate Leapsome offers extensive integrations and granular review scheduling and survey visualizations. Competitor claims should be verified via demonstrations and test configurations. - **Leapsome vs 15Five:** - 15Five publishes clear pricing tiers and may offer procurement speed and budget predictability advantages compared with vendors that require sales engagement to price.

Market signals / adoption trends

Leapsome’s substantial volume of G2 reviews indicates broad usage. Buyers should review detailed, critical feedback and conduct pilots or trials to verify product-market fit for their specific needs.

	Leapsome	Lattice	15Five
Starting Price	Quote-based / contact sales (public pages often do not list per-seat)	Competitor-published starting price (publicly disclosed by the competitor)	Public pricing lists tiered per-user pricing depending on package
Best For	Organizations wanting a modular platform combining reviews + goals + surveys + learning + HRIS and prepared to invest in setup	Organizations prioritizing usability and structured talent processes	Organizations seeking clear tiered pricing and packaged engagement + performance features
Key Strength	Breadth of modules and documented SSO/SCIM readiness; users report useful meeting tracking features	Perceived as user-friendly with structured talent processes and analytics	Transparent pricing; packaged plans for predictable procurement
Key Weakness	Complexity/learning curve; setup effort; some UX/workflow friction	Can become costly with add-ons; feature depth varies by module	May require add-ons for advanced needs; pricing and packaging can change over time