Legion

Name: Legion
Brand: Legion
Rating: 4.4 (55 reviews)

Intelligent Automation Powered by Legion Workforce Management

Est 2016|Valuation $330M|Raised $194.3M|30 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 31K|Web traffic 85K|FTEs 245|HQ Redwood City, California, US

MarketsTime, Attendance, & Leave Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Legion appears to be comparatively strong (based on reviewer sentiment and vendor statements): - reviewer feedback frequently highlights the mobile interface and usability - the vendor positions forecasting and scheduling as incorporating machine learning as core components - vendor materials report strong availability and performance (vendor claims) Where alternatives may be stronger: - UKG: long-standing product depth and wide enterprise footprint; may better cover highly complex labor rules and legacy timekeeping integrations, at the cost of potential implementation complexity - Deputy: transparent published pricing and ease of trial for small-to-mid deployments; may be a preferred fit for organizations seeking fast evaluation and predictable published per-user pricing - Quinyx: positioned as an enterprise WFM in several markets with a strong UI and global footprint; buyers should compare functionality and regional presence

Pricing comparison (what can be validated)

Legion: not publicly listed; expect enterprise quote-based pricing
Deputy: publishes public per-user pricing (tiered plans) available from the vendor
UKG: quote-based; some public-sector and regional documents may show examples but not universal pricing

Customer testimonials comparing products

Direct public migration stories comparing Legion to specific competitors were not identified in accessible sources during this research run.

	Legion WFM	UKG (Pro WFM / Dimensions)	Deputy
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Not transparently public (quote-based)	Published per-user pricing available from the vendor (tiered plans)
Best For	Multi-site hourly workforces seeking integrated forecasting, automated scheduling, and a mobile employee experience	Enterprises needing mature timekeeping, complex rules, and a broad HCM ecosystem	SMB and mid-market customers needing quick-to-deploy scheduling and time tracking with transparent published per-user pricing
Key Strength	Integrated forecasting and scheduling with a mobile-first employee interface (vendor-stated and reviewer-reported)	Mature feature set and extensive enterprise deployments	Transparent published pricing and low barrier to trial and initial deployment
Key Weakness	Opaque pricing and some reports of feature gaps during implementation	Can be complex to implement; product complexity can increase project effort	May require add-ons or higher tiers for advanced enterprise features

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Legion appears to be comparatively strong (based on reviewer sentiment and vendor statements):

reviewer feedback frequently highlights the mobile interface and usability
the vendor positions forecasting and scheduling as incorporating machine learning as core components
vendor materials report strong availability and performance (vendor claims)

Where alternatives may be stronger:

UKG: long-standing product depth and wide enterprise footprint; may better cover highly complex labor rules and legacy timekeeping integrations, at the cost of potential implementation complexity
Deputy: transparent published pricing and ease of trial for small-to-mid deployments; may be a preferred fit for organizations seeking fast evaluation and predictable published per-user pricing
Quinyx: positioned as an enterprise WFM in several markets with a strong UI and global footprint; buyers should compare functionality and regional presence

Pricing comparison (what can be validated)

Legion: not publicly listed; expect enterprise quote-based pricing
Deputy: publishes public per-user pricing (tiered plans) available from the vendor
UKG: quote-based; some public-sector and regional documents may show examples but not universal pricing

Customer testimonials comparing products

Direct public migration stories comparing Legion to specific competitors were not identified in accessible sources during this research run.

	Legion WFM	UKG (Pro WFM / Dimensions)	Deputy
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Not transparently public (quote-based)	Published per-user pricing available from the vendor (tiered plans)
Best For	Multi-site hourly workforces seeking integrated forecasting, automated scheduling, and a mobile employee experience	Enterprises needing mature timekeeping, complex rules, and a broad HCM ecosystem	SMB and mid-market customers needing quick-to-deploy scheduling and time tracking with transparent published per-user pricing
Key Strength	Integrated forecasting and scheduling with a mobile-first employee interface (vendor-stated and reviewer-reported)	Mature feature set and extensive enterprise deployments	Transparent published pricing and low barrier to trial and initial deployment
Key Weakness	Opaque pricing and some reports of feature gaps during implementation	Can be complex to implement; product complexity can increase project effort	May require add-ons or higher tiers for advanced enterprise features