Levitate

Name: Levitate
Brand: Levitate
Rating: 4.7 (456 reviews)

Scalable, authentic communication tools that nurture your network with ease - all in one place.

Est 2017|Valuation $215M|Raised $70.6M|42 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 10K|Web traffic 117K|FTEs 431|HQ Raleigh, NC

MarketsEmail Marketing

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Versus Constant Contact/Mailchimp: The vendor differentiates on a relationship-oriented approach combined with vendor-delivered services and multi-channel features. Organizations that primarily require a DIY newsletter tool and a wide marketplace of integrations may prefer Constant Contact or Mailchimp for simplicity and price. - Versus HubSpot: HubSpot provides a broader platform that includes CRM, deep automation, and stronger attribution. Organizations with a marketing operations capability and requirements for complex workflows and reporting may prefer HubSpot despite its higher cost and configuration requirements.

Adoption trends / market presence signals

Press coverage and vendor materials reference customer milestones alongside independent reporting. Industry survey documents show Levitate appearing within certain advisor and insurance software category lists; these documents provide directional evidence rather than audited market-share measurements.

	Levitate (relationship-marketing platform)	Constant Contact	HubSpot Marketing Hub
Starting Price	Primarily sales-led / contact sales; bundled platform and services	Entry-level plans available with monthly pricing (scales with contacts)	Entry-level tiers available; professional tiers and enterprise pricing scale with contacts and features
Best Suited For	Relationship-oriented SMBs seeking a platform with vendor-led onboarding, templates, and multi-channel capabilities	SMBs needing a straightforward, DIY email/newsletter tool	Teams requiring deeper marketing automation, attribution, and CRM integration
Key Strengths	Vendor-provided onboarding and strategic support; multi-channel features and industry-focused templates	Simplicity and a broad user base; established email-building tools	Breadth and depth of automation, analytics, and CRM integration capabilities
Key Weaknesses	Integration gaps with some niche systems; limited public price transparency; template/customization constraints	Less vendor-led services; primarily DIY approach	Cost and complexity can scale substantially; onboarding and configuration can require significant resources

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Versus Constant Contact/Mailchimp: The vendor differentiates on a relationship-oriented approach combined with vendor-delivered services and multi-channel features. Organizations that primarily require a DIY newsletter tool and a wide marketplace of integrations may prefer Constant Contact or Mailchimp for simplicity and price.
Versus HubSpot: HubSpot provides a broader platform that includes CRM, deep automation, and stronger attribution. Organizations with a marketing operations capability and requirements for complex workflows and reporting may prefer HubSpot despite its higher cost and configuration requirements.

Adoption trends / market presence signals

	Levitate (relationship-marketing platform)	Constant Contact	HubSpot Marketing Hub
Starting Price	Primarily sales-led / contact sales; bundled platform and services	Entry-level plans available with monthly pricing (scales with contacts)	Entry-level tiers available; professional tiers and enterprise pricing scale with contacts and features
Best Suited For	Relationship-oriented SMBs seeking a platform with vendor-led onboarding, templates, and multi-channel capabilities	SMBs needing a straightforward, DIY email/newsletter tool	Teams requiring deeper marketing automation, attribution, and CRM integration
Key Strengths	Vendor-provided onboarding and strategic support; multi-channel features and industry-focused templates	Simplicity and a broad user base; established email-building tools	Breadth and depth of automation, analytics, and CRM integration capabilities
Key Weaknesses	Integration gaps with some niche systems; limited public price transparency; template/customization constraints	Less vendor-led services; primarily DIY approach	Cost and complexity can scale substantially; onboarding and configuration can require significant resources