Levity

Name: Levity
Brand: Levity
Rating: 3.8 (2 reviews)

Reliable AI automation for complex email & phone workflows in logistics.

Est 2018|Raised $11M|12 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 7K|Web traffic 4K|FTEs 37|HQ Berlin, Berlin, DE

MarketsFreight Management Workflow Automation

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Levity vs Zapier: Zapier excels at cross-app automation breadth. Levity appears more specialized for unstructured operational workflows (emails/attachments) with domain constraints and controls.
Levity vs Make: Make provides visual automation and an official Levity connector; some teams may use Levity as the AI component within Make scenarios.
Levity vs UiPath: UiPath targets end-to-end enterprise automation (RPA + Document Understanding) and is heavier in scope; UiPath’s document processing requires enterprise licensing and implementation planning.

- Levity vs Zapier: Zapier excels at cross-app automation breadth. Levity appears more specialized for unstructured operational workflows (emails/attachments) with domain constraints and controls. - Levity vs Make: Make provides visual automation and an official Levity connector; some teams may use Levity as the AI component within Make scenarios. - Levity vs UiPath: UiPath targets end-to-end enterprise automation (RPA + Document Understanding) and is heavier in scope; UiPath’s document processing requires enterprise licensing and implementation planning.

Adoption trends / market share

No authoritative public market share data was found in this research pass. Public review volume is currently too low to infer broad adoption from review-platform signals alone.

	Levity	Zapier	Microsoft Power Automate
Starting Price	Reported low-tier monthly subscription on third-party listings (verify with vendor)	Free tier; professional tier at a low monthly price billed annually (usage-based tasks)	Premium per-user monthly pricing billed annually
Primary use case	Logistics/operations teams automating unstructured email/attachment and phone workflows with rules and monitoring	Broad SaaS-to-SaaS automation across thousands of apps; rapid integrations	Organizations standardizing on Microsoft ecosystem; governance + DLP; citizen developer scenarios
Key strengths	Focus on unstructured workflow automation, monitoring, and controls (per vendor materials)	Ecosystem breadth and mature automation patterns; many templates	Enterprise governance integration (DLP, environments), strong M365/Dynamics integrations
Key weaknesses	Limited independent review volume; public pricing/packaging clarity varies; may be more complex than necessary outside logistics scenarios	Costs scale with task volume; less specialized for domain-specific unstructured operations	Licensing complexity; some scenarios require premium connectors and governance planning