Logiwa

Name: Logiwa
Brand: Logiwa
Rating: 4.5 (138 reviews)

Helping companies launch, grow and scale your direct-to-consumer fulfillment businesses. #FulfillBrilliantly

Est 2017|Valuation $111.4M|Raised $38.9M

LinkedIn 14K|Website|Web traffic 45K|FTEs 124|HQ Chicago, Illinois, US

MarketsMaterials Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis: differentiation & buyer tradeoffs

- Logiwa versus Manhattan: Logiwa is positioned for shorter implementations and a modern interface for mid-market use cases, while Manhattan targets Tier-1 enterprise capability with deeper functionality and a longer implementation horizon. Buyers trading off time-to-value against breadth of functionality should evaluate both functional fit and implementation risk. - Logiwa versus ShipHero: ShipHero publishes pricing and targets DTC workflows; Logiwa emphasizes multi-client separation and integrations for 3PLs. Differentiation is often driven by multi-client billing/segregation requirements, integration depth, and operational complexity. - Logiwa versus Deposco: Both vendors position capabilities around fulfillment orchestration and analytics; comparative evaluation should focus on validated customer outcomes, integration breadth, and commercial terms rather than headline marketing claims.

Competitor perspectives / pricing pages (examples)

ShipHero publishes WMS pricing pages.
Manhattan Associates provides enterprise sales and support positioning and typically requires sales engagement for pricing.
Extensiv and other providers publish product pages and may offer clearer published pricing for some product components.

	Logiwa	ShipHero WMS	Manhattan Associates (WMS)
Starting Price	Custom quote (volume/complexity-based; not public)	Published pricing pages; third-party reporting references ranges for some tiers	Sales-led enterprise pricing (not public)
Best For	Mid-market ecommerce fulfillment; growth-focused 3PLs needing multi-client operations and integrations	Brands and 3PLs seeking packaged WMS with published tiers and DTC workflows	Large enterprises and complex distribution networks requiring extensive functionality and scalability
Key Strength	Cloud-native architecture; multi-client WMS focus; integration ecosystem; shorter template-driven go-live options	Published pricing and packaging; DTC/3PL feature sets	Depth of functionality; enterprise scalability; extensive support models
Key Weakness	Pricing not publicly published; integration quality may vary by connector; reported sales/contract expectation gaps in some reviews	Costs can increase with scale; plan complexity for some buyers	Typically longer implementations; higher total cost and complexity

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis: differentiation & buyer tradeoffs

Logiwa versus Manhattan: Logiwa is positioned for shorter implementations and a modern interface for mid-market use cases, while Manhattan targets Tier-1 enterprise capability with deeper functionality and a longer implementation horizon. Buyers trading off time-to-value against breadth of functionality should evaluate both functional fit and implementation risk.
Logiwa versus ShipHero: ShipHero publishes pricing and targets DTC workflows; Logiwa emphasizes multi-client separation and integrations for 3PLs. Differentiation is often driven by multi-client billing/segregation requirements, integration depth, and operational complexity.
Logiwa versus Deposco: Both vendors position capabilities around fulfillment orchestration and analytics; comparative evaluation should focus on validated customer outcomes, integration breadth, and commercial terms rather than headline marketing claims.

Competitor perspectives / pricing pages (examples)

ShipHero publishes WMS pricing pages.
Manhattan Associates provides enterprise sales and support positioning and typically requires sales engagement for pricing.
Extensiv and other providers publish product pages and may offer clearer published pricing for some product components.

	Logiwa	ShipHero WMS	Manhattan Associates (WMS)
Starting Price	Custom quote (volume/complexity-based; not public)	Published pricing pages; third-party reporting references ranges for some tiers	Sales-led enterprise pricing (not public)
Best For	Mid-market ecommerce fulfillment; growth-focused 3PLs needing multi-client operations and integrations	Brands and 3PLs seeking packaged WMS with published tiers and DTC workflows	Large enterprises and complex distribution networks requiring extensive functionality and scalability
Key Strength	Cloud-native architecture; multi-client WMS focus; integration ecosystem; shorter template-driven go-live options	Published pricing and packaging; DTC/3PL feature sets	Depth of functionality; enterprise scalability; extensive support models
Key Weakness	Pricing not publicly published; integration quality may vary by connector; reported sales/contract expectation gaps in some reviews	Costs can increase with scale; plan complexity for some buyers	Typically longer implementations; higher total cost and complexity