Loop & Tie

Name: Loop & Tie
Brand: Loop & Tie
Rating: 4.8 (14 reviews)

Sustainable corporate gifts that give back. Easy to send, fun to receive.

Est 2013|Valuation $24.1M|Raised $6.8M

LinkedIn 3K|Website|Web traffic 19K|FTEs 38|HQ Austin, Texas, US

MarketsDirect Mail & Gifting Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Sendoso generally competes in the enterprise segment with emphasis on attribution and large-scale logistics; its positioning tends to focus on revenue operations and scale, though that often corresponds with higher pricing.
Goody competes on a streamlined link-based sending experience with a publicly documented Pro plan for small-to-medium teams.
Reachdesk and similar vendors often position around global fulfillment and operational depth.

Feature comparison: where Loop & Tie appears to excel vs. lag

Areas where Loop & Tie appears to provide value based on public materials and reviews: - Recipient-choice redemption model with address capture at redemption - Integrations targeting Salesforce workflows - Public communication of sustainability initiatives and curated collections Areas that require diligence: - Publicly verifiable enterprise security documentation (SOC 2 Type II reports, SAML/SCIM provisioning) - Catalog depth at certain price points, which some reviewers identified as a limitation

Market share and adoption trends

No authoritative market share data for Loop & Tie was identified in the materials accessed for this research. Industry commentary discusses the broader corporate gifting category but does not provide reliable market share figures for this vendor.

	Loop & Tie	Goody	Snappy
Starting Price	Published free plan; shipping fees indicated on entry plan	Published Pro plan pricing examples available in vendor documentation	Published entry plan available in public materials
Typical use cases	Choice-based gifting with curated collections; teams using Salesforce workflows	Send-by-link gifting and self-serve Pro plan	Gift and swag programs with emphasis on broader international sending
Key strengths	Recipient-driven selection; curated marketplace; public sustainability initiatives	Streamlined link-based gifting with publicly documented Pro plan	Entry plan availability and claims of broad international reach
Key weakness	Publicly documented enterprise security details (SOC 2 Type II, SAML/SCIM) are limited	Full enterprise pricing and feature boundaries may require sales engagement	Enterprise-level features and detailed pricing often require quote-based engagement

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Sendoso generally competes in the enterprise segment with emphasis on attribution and large-scale logistics; its positioning tends to focus on revenue operations and scale, though that often corresponds with higher pricing.
Goody competes on a streamlined link-based sending experience with a publicly documented Pro plan for small-to-medium teams.
Reachdesk and similar vendors often position around global fulfillment and operational depth.

Feature comparison: where Loop & Tie appears to excel vs. lag

Areas where Loop & Tie appears to provide value based on public materials and reviews:

Recipient-choice redemption model with address capture at redemption
Integrations targeting Salesforce workflows
Public communication of sustainability initiatives and curated collections

Areas that require diligence:

Publicly verifiable enterprise security documentation (SOC 2 Type II reports, SAML/SCIM provisioning)
Catalog depth at certain price points, which some reviewers identified as a limitation

Market share and adoption trends

	Loop & Tie	Goody	Snappy
Starting Price	Published free plan; shipping fees indicated on entry plan	Published Pro plan pricing examples available in vendor documentation	Published entry plan available in public materials
Typical use cases	Choice-based gifting with curated collections; teams using Salesforce workflows	Send-by-link gifting and self-serve Pro plan	Gift and swag programs with emphasis on broader international sending
Key strengths	Recipient-driven selection; curated marketplace; public sustainability initiatives	Streamlined link-based gifting with publicly documented Pro plan	Entry plan availability and claims of broad international reach
Key weakness	Publicly documented enterprise security details (SOC 2 Type II, SAML/SCIM) are limited	Full enterprise pricing and feature boundaries may require sales engagement	Enterprise-level features and detailed pricing often require quote-based engagement