Lunavo

Name: Lunavo
Brand: Lunavo

AI Native

The AI Assistant for Carriers.

Est 2025|Raised $500K

LinkedIn 352|Website|FTEs 2

MarketsFreight Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Potential strengths: if the vendor's implementation reliably writes to TMS and portals, the product may reduce manual swivel-chair tasks compared with solutions that only assist users with insights.
Potential competitor advantages:
- If packaged pricing and quick time-to-value are priorities, vendors with published pricing and specialized offerings (e.g., quoting tools) may be preferable.
- If enterprise compliance and published certifications are procurement requirements, larger, established TMS vendors and mature SaaS providers are more likely to have verifiable security documentation.

- Potential strengths: if the vendor's implementation reliably writes to TMS and portals, the product may reduce manual swivel-chair tasks compared with solutions that only assist users with insights. - Potential competitor advantages: - If packaged pricing and quick time-to-value are priorities, vendors with published pricing and specialized offerings (e.g., quoting tools) may be preferable. - If enterprise compliance and published certifications are procurement requirements, larger, established TMS vendors and mature SaaS providers are more likely to have verifiable security documentation.

Adoption / market share

No public market share or installed-base metrics were found for Lunavo.

	Lunavo (vendor product pages)	Captain Cargo	VoltusFreight
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (demo-led)	Published per-quote pricing available from the vendor	Published per-user SaaS pricing available from the vendor
Primary Use Case	Carriers/forwarders seeking back-office execution automation (order entry, updates, invoices)	Freight forwarders focused on quoting workflows and win rates	Freight forwarders seeking a modular ERP with an AI email agent and broader suite
Key Strength	Vendor states the product performs execution tasks (writing updates back into systems) rather than only generating insights; vertical focus on carrier back-office workflows	Clear usage-based pricing and specialization in quoting workflows	Publicly stated trial and per-user SaaS pricing; broader ERP functionality
Key Weakness	Limited public details on pricing, security certifications, and case studies	Focused primarily on quoting; may not address broader back-office automation needs	Potential implementation complexity given the broader ERP scope