Mastt

Name: Mastt
Brand: Mastt
Rating: 4.6 (25 reviews)

Construction project management software powered by AI - Faster reporting. Clear control. Less admin.

LinkedIn 8K|Website|Web traffic 24K|FTEs 32|HQ Sydney, New South Wales, AU

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Mastt compared with Procore: Mastt is more explicitly owner-controls and reporting oriented with published per-project pricing. Procore is broader and is often selected when organizations need in-depth field workflows, subcontractor management, and an established ecosystem; Procore's pricing is not published publicly in many markets. - Mastt compared with Aconex: Aconex is commonly used for document management and can complement owner-focused controls tools; some buyers use Aconex for document control and a separate tool for dashboards and cost/risk reporting. - Mastt compared with Kahua/InEight/EcoSys: These competitors provide well-established owner PMIS and project-controls depth in many enterprise settings; selection typically depends on existing enterprise requirements, integration needs, and procurement processes.

Market adoption signals

Mastt appears in industry directories and lists. LinkedIn lists Mastt with a small reported headcount, and vendor statements about customer counts are noted but were not independently verified in this research session.

	Mastt	Procore	Oracle Aconex
Starting Price	Published per-project pricing available from the vendor; an introductory free-project option is reported	Custom quote (no fixed tiers publicly published)	Enterprise quote (varies by scope/region)
Best For	Owner-side capital project controls and portfolio reporting; PMOs seeking a spreadsheet replacement	Broad construction management across general contractors and owners; extensive module ecosystem	Document control / CDE workflows for large infrastructure projects
Key Strength	Published pricing model; portfolio roll-up capabilities; owner-focused project-controls orientation	Market penetration; large partner ecosystem and field-focused modules	Strong formal document workflows and adoption in major infrastructure projects
Key Weakness	Reported UI complexity; integration gaps (ERP); limited publicly accessible security documentation	Pricing opacity and potential cost escalation reported in community discussions	Typically paired with other controls tools; not primarily focused on owner-side cost/risk reporting

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Mastt compared with Procore: Mastt is more explicitly owner-controls and reporting oriented with published per-project pricing. Procore is broader and is often selected when organizations need in-depth field workflows, subcontractor management, and an established ecosystem; Procore's pricing is not published publicly in many markets.
Mastt compared with Aconex: Aconex is commonly used for document management and can complement owner-focused controls tools; some buyers use Aconex for document control and a separate tool for dashboards and cost/risk reporting.
Mastt compared with Kahua/InEight/EcoSys: These competitors provide well-established owner PMIS and project-controls depth in many enterprise settings; selection typically depends on existing enterprise requirements, integration needs, and procurement processes.

Market adoption signals

Mastt appears in industry directories and lists. LinkedIn lists Mastt with a small reported headcount, and vendor statements about customer counts are noted but were not independently verified in this research session.

	Mastt	Procore	Oracle Aconex
Starting Price	Published per-project pricing available from the vendor; an introductory free-project option is reported	Custom quote (no fixed tiers publicly published)	Enterprise quote (varies by scope/region)
Best For	Owner-side capital project controls and portfolio reporting; PMOs seeking a spreadsheet replacement	Broad construction management across general contractors and owners; extensive module ecosystem	Document control / CDE workflows for large infrastructure projects
Key Strength	Published pricing model; portfolio roll-up capabilities; owner-focused project-controls orientation	Market penetration; large partner ecosystem and field-focused modules	Strong formal document workflows and adoption in major infrastructure projects
Key Weakness	Reported UI complexity; integration gaps (ERP); limited publicly accessible security documentation	Pricing opacity and potential cost escalation reported in community discussions	Typically paired with other controls tools; not primarily focused on owner-side cost/risk reporting

Mastt

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Market adoption signals

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Market adoption signals

02Market Map