Mentimeter

Name: Mentimeter
Brand: Mentimeter

Leader

Turn your presentations into conversations with Mentimeter. The new way to run meetings, trainings and courses.

Est 2012|Valuation $3.5B|Raised $43M|13 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 40K|Web traffic 4.3M|FTEs 432|HQ Stockholm, Stockholm County, SE

MarketsPresentation Software Executive Town Halls & All-Hands Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Mentimeter vs Slido: - Slido is often evaluated as stronger for moderated Q&A, event facilitation, and enterprise meeting workflows. - Mentimeter is often evaluated as more approachable for creating quick, visually oriented interactive slides. - For structured event Q&A pipelines and moderation workflows, Slido may be preferable; for rapid creation of visually focused interactive slides, Mentimeter may be preferred. Mentimeter vs Poll Everywhere: - Poll Everywhere emphasizes reporting and structured response management, together with enterprise support and controls. - Mentimeter is frequently chosen for simplicity and presentation-first engagement. Mentimeter vs AhaSlides: - AhaSlides often presents lower public pricing and can be shortlisted by buyers focused on cost. Buyers should validate feature parity and product maturity through trials.

Adoption trends / market share

No authoritative market share figures were captured in the collected sources. Review volume on G2 indicates significant adoption, but review counts are not a direct proxy for market share.

	Mentimeter	Slido	Poll Everywhere
Starting Price	Commonly listed in the low double-digit per-month range for entry tiers, with higher-cost Pro/Enterprise tiers reported by aggregators (varies by source)	Commonly reported starting in the mid double-digit per-month range on third-party listings	Entry tiers commonly listed in the low double-digit per-month range on official plans; billed options vary by annual vs event pricing
Primary Use Cases	Interactive moments inside presentations; education and corporate training; quick setup for live interaction	Meetings/events with strong Q&A and moderation; deep integrations with meeting platforms	Polling and structured reporting/analytics; education and organizations that need reporting and participation controls
Key Strength	Easy participant access, visually oriented defaults, a broad range of question types	Q&A moderation, event facilitation, enterprise meeting integrations	Reporting, attendance/controls, enterprise options and support tiers
Key Weakness	PowerPoint add-in constraints; customization and value concerns at higher tiers	Pricing and plan complexity; limited monthly flexibility in some cases	Cost can increase as needs scale; per-audience and plan boundaries affect total price

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Mentimeter vs Slido:

Slido is often evaluated as stronger for moderated Q&A, event facilitation, and enterprise meeting workflows.
Mentimeter is often evaluated as more approachable for creating quick, visually oriented interactive slides.
For structured event Q&A pipelines and moderation workflows, Slido may be preferable; for rapid creation of visually focused interactive slides, Mentimeter may be preferred.

Mentimeter vs Poll Everywhere:

Poll Everywhere emphasizes reporting and structured response management, together with enterprise support and controls.
Mentimeter is frequently chosen for simplicity and presentation-first engagement.

Mentimeter vs AhaSlides:

AhaSlides often presents lower public pricing and can be shortlisted by buyers focused on cost. Buyers should validate feature parity and product maturity through trials.

Adoption trends / market share

No authoritative market share figures were captured in the collected sources. Review volume on G2 indicates significant adoption, but review counts are not a direct proxy for market share.

	Mentimeter	Slido	Poll Everywhere
Starting Price	Commonly listed in the low double-digit per-month range for entry tiers, with higher-cost Pro/Enterprise tiers reported by aggregators (varies by source)	Commonly reported starting in the mid double-digit per-month range on third-party listings	Entry tiers commonly listed in the low double-digit per-month range on official plans; billed options vary by annual vs event pricing
Primary Use Cases	Interactive moments inside presentations; education and corporate training; quick setup for live interaction	Meetings/events with strong Q&A and moderation; deep integrations with meeting platforms	Polling and structured reporting/analytics; education and organizations that need reporting and participation controls
Key Strength	Easy participant access, visually oriented defaults, a broad range of question types	Q&A moderation, event facilitation, enterprise meeting integrations	Reporting, attendance/controls, enterprise options and support tiers
Key Weakness	PowerPoint add-in constraints; customization and value concerns at higher tiers	Pricing and plan complexity; limited monthly flexibility in some cases	Cost can increase as needs scale; per-audience and plan boundaries affect total price