1) **Small teams with simple workflows**
- Teams that mainly need Kanban and lightweight timelines may find Microsoft Project, particularly the desktop product, to be excessive; alternatives such as Asana, monday.com, or Wrike can provide faster time-to-value.
2) **Organizations that cannot tolerate roadmap uncertainty**
- Organizations currently on **Project Online (PWA)** face a retirement date of **Sep 30, 2026**. Organizations that cannot complete migration before that date should evaluate alternatives.
3) **Teams needing best-in-class portfolio management “out of the box”**
- Some users report that Microsoft Project is more effective for scheduling than for out-of-the-box portfolio management; significant reporting and configuration effort may be required.
4) **Workforces that demand modern collaboration UX for all contributors**
- Desktop Project is oriented toward dedicated project managers; many contributors prefer updating tasks in applications that emphasize lightweight collaboration.
5) **If required features are not supported in the web experience**
- Microsoft documentation indicates that importing .mpp into the web experience can exclude or alter features (e.g., baselines, certain constraints, cross-project dependencies, recurring tasks, some resource behaviors).