Mobileforce

Name: Mobileforce
Brand: Mobileforce
Rating: 5 (5 reviews)

Mobileforce is a B2B revenue operations platform that provides CPQ, approvals, proposal generation, CRM/ERP integrations, field service management, and customer/partner portals to link quoting with downstream service workflows.

Est 2005|Valuation $17.9M|Raised $19.1M|22 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 765|Web traffic 32K|FTEs 18

MarketsCPQ Software (Configure, Price, Quote)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Mobileforce vs Salesforce CPQ - Salesforce CPQ is often selected by organizations that require deep, native integration within the Salesforce ecosystem and access to a large implementation partner network. Buyers commonly cite higher license and implementation costs in that ecosystem. - Mobileforce markets a configuration-driven approach that aims to reduce engineering dependence and position itself as more accessible on price and admin agility; buyers should validate integration depth, scaling characteristics, and long-term governance costs. Mobileforce vs DealHub - DealHub emphasizes modern quote-to-revenue and buyer-facing workflows. Mobileforce differentiates through integration of CPQ and service workflows and offline/field quoting capabilities. Buyers should evaluate buyer-facing experience, collaboration features, and integration depth relative to DealHub. Mobileforce vs Conga CPQ - Conga has established capabilities in document generation, CLM, and CPQ, often serving enterprise-scale use cases. - Mobileforce’s positioning focuses on configuration and operational simplicity; buyers should weigh enterprise requirements for compliance, ecosystem breadth, and partner availability. Adoption trends / market share - No credible public market share data for Mobileforce was found in the sources reviewed. - The low volume of third-party reviews suggests a more niche footprint or a sales motion that does not translate into high public review counts.

	Mobileforce CPQ	Salesforce CPQ	DealHub
Starting Price	Tiered per-user pricing starting toward the lower end of published CPQ per-user ranges	Higher per-user starting price relative to many non-native CPQ options	Pricing available via sales (not openly listed)
Typical buyer profile	Teams seeking a configuration-driven CPQ with field/offline capabilities and integrated service workflows	Salesforce-first enterprises seeking native ecosystem alignment and broad partner ecosystem	Organizations seeking quote-to-revenue workflows with buyer-facing experiences and deal collaboration
Key Strength	Emphasis on admin-led configuration and offline/hybrid quoting capabilities; publicly listed starting prices	Deep Salesforce ecosystem integration; extensive partner and implementation ecosystem	Focus on buyer experience, deal rooms, and approvals; modern quote-to-revenue features
Key Weakness	Limited publicly available security/compliance documentation; small independent review footprint	Higher license and implementation costs; can require significant partner services for customization	Pricing and TCO visibility limited; procurement process may require additional discovery

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Mobileforce vs Salesforce CPQ

Salesforce CPQ is often selected by organizations that require deep, native integration within the Salesforce ecosystem and access to a large implementation partner network. Buyers commonly cite higher license and implementation costs in that ecosystem.
Mobileforce markets a configuration-driven approach that aims to reduce engineering dependence and position itself as more accessible on price and admin agility; buyers should validate integration depth, scaling characteristics, and long-term governance costs.

Mobileforce vs DealHub

DealHub emphasizes modern quote-to-revenue and buyer-facing workflows. Mobileforce differentiates through integration of CPQ and service workflows and offline/field quoting capabilities. Buyers should evaluate buyer-facing experience, collaboration features, and integration depth relative to DealHub.

Mobileforce vs Conga CPQ

Conga has established capabilities in document generation, CLM, and CPQ, often serving enterprise-scale use cases.
Mobileforce’s positioning focuses on configuration and operational simplicity; buyers should weigh enterprise requirements for compliance, ecosystem breadth, and partner availability.

Adoption trends / market share

No credible public market share data for Mobileforce was found in the sources reviewed.
The low volume of third-party reviews suggests a more niche footprint or a sales motion that does not translate into high public review counts.

	Mobileforce CPQ	Salesforce CPQ	DealHub
Starting Price	Tiered per-user pricing starting toward the lower end of published CPQ per-user ranges	Higher per-user starting price relative to many non-native CPQ options	Pricing available via sales (not openly listed)
Typical buyer profile	Teams seeking a configuration-driven CPQ with field/offline capabilities and integrated service workflows	Salesforce-first enterprises seeking native ecosystem alignment and broad partner ecosystem	Organizations seeking quote-to-revenue workflows with buyer-facing experiences and deal collaboration
Key Strength	Emphasis on admin-led configuration and offline/hybrid quoting capabilities; publicly listed starting prices	Deep Salesforce ecosystem integration; extensive partner and implementation ecosystem	Focus on buyer experience, deal rooms, and approvals; modern quote-to-revenue features
Key Weakness	Limited publicly available security/compliance documentation; small independent review footprint	Higher license and implementation costs; can require significant partner services for customization	Pricing and TCO visibility limited; procurement process may require additional discovery