Modjo

Name: Modjo
Brand: Modjo
Rating: 4.7 (143 reviews)

The everyday AI for top-performing sales teams. Automate what slows them down. Amplify what truly wins deals.

Est 2019|Valuation $56.5M|Raised $9.4M|30 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 10K|Web traffic 83K|FTEs 79|HQ Paris, Île-de-France, FR

MarketsConversation Intelligence Rep Coaching Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Comparative analysis

- Modjo positions itself as an option for European customers that prioritize EU data hosting and CRM automation. Claims about affordability relative to specific competitors should be validated during procurement. - Gong is typically selected by larger organizations that require deep analytics, mature forecasting, and a broad integration ecosystem; these capabilities can come with higher cost and implementation requirements. - Chorus (ZoomInfo) may be an appropriate selection for teams already invested in ZoomInfo’s data and workflows. - Lighter meeting tools such as Avoma, Fathom, Fireflies, and tl;dv often provide faster, self-serve adoption and transparent pricing; these tools may be preferred by small teams or non-sales use cases.

Adoption trends and market signals

Vendor-reported adoption figures and review volumes suggest traction in the European market, but public review footprint remains smaller than the largest incumbents.

	Modjo	Gong	Chorus.ai (ZoomInfo)
Starting Price	Not publicly standardized (quote-based); third-party estimate in the low hundreds per user/month (unverified)	Reported by third parties as high; often enterprise bundles and associated fees (varies)	Pricing typically quote-based; positioning and tiers vary by vendor
Best For	EU-based revenue teams seeking conversation intelligence with CRM automation and EU data hosting	Larger organizations seeking broader revenue intelligence capabilities, more mature analytics, and an extensive integration ecosystem	Organizations using the ZoomInfo ecosystem or seeking integrated data and conversation intelligence
Key Strength	Emphasis on EU hosting and CRM automation; references to SOC 2 compliance	Product maturity and depth of analytics and forecasting capabilities	Integration with ZoomInfo data and potential cost positioning relative to larger incumbents
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity; reported AI accuracy issues and integration/sync friction in some reviews	Higher cost and potentially heavier implementation effort	Variable feature depth depending on bundle and vendor strategy

01Competitive Landscape

Comparative analysis

Modjo positions itself as an option for European customers that prioritize EU data hosting and CRM automation. Claims about affordability relative to specific competitors should be validated during procurement.
Gong is typically selected by larger organizations that require deep analytics, mature forecasting, and a broad integration ecosystem; these capabilities can come with higher cost and implementation requirements.
Chorus (ZoomInfo) may be an appropriate selection for teams already invested in ZoomInfo’s data and workflows.
Lighter meeting tools such as Avoma, Fathom, Fireflies, and tl;dv often provide faster, self-serve adoption and transparent pricing; these tools may be preferred by small teams or non-sales use cases.

Adoption trends and market signals

Vendor-reported adoption figures and review volumes suggest traction in the European market, but public review footprint remains smaller than the largest incumbents.

	Modjo	Gong	Chorus.ai (ZoomInfo)
Starting Price	Not publicly standardized (quote-based); third-party estimate in the low hundreds per user/month (unverified)	Reported by third parties as high; often enterprise bundles and associated fees (varies)	Pricing typically quote-based; positioning and tiers vary by vendor
Best For	EU-based revenue teams seeking conversation intelligence with CRM automation and EU data hosting	Larger organizations seeking broader revenue intelligence capabilities, more mature analytics, and an extensive integration ecosystem	Organizations using the ZoomInfo ecosystem or seeking integrated data and conversation intelligence
Key Strength	Emphasis on EU hosting and CRM automation; references to SOC 2 compliance	Product maturity and depth of analytics and forecasting capabilities	Integration with ZoomInfo data and potential cost positioning relative to larger incumbents
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity; reported AI accuracy issues and integration/sync friction in some reviews	Higher cost and potentially heavier implementation effort	Variable feature depth depending on bundle and vendor strategy