Modulos

Name: Modulos
Brand: Modulos

Developing and operating AI products and services in a new regulated environment

Est 2018|Raised $10.9M|4 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 8K|Web traffic 5K|FTEs 17|HQ Zurich, Zurich, CH

MarketsLegal AI

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

#### Modulos vs IBM watsonx.governance - IBM: Published pricing structure and established enterprise ecosystem integration. Broad enterprise credibility and procurement familiarity. - Modulos: Focused on multi-framework mappings and controls/evidence workflows with an entry-level free offering. Potentially a lighter-entry specialist for EU AI Act and ISO 42001 workflows. - Decision driver: Organizations seeking a broad enterprise governance suite integrated with an incumbent vendor ecosystem may favor IBM; organizations seeking a focused compliance/workflow tool oriented to EU AI Act / ISO 42001 may evaluate Modulos. #### Modulos vs Monitaur - Monitaur: Emphasizes policy-to-proof lifecycle and regulated-industry validation. - Modulos: Emphasizes multi-framework mappings and AI-supported governance workflows. - Decision driver: Organizational governance operating model maturity and required depth of assurance vs compliance documentation will influence vendor choice. #### Modulos vs Fiddler (adjacent) - Fiddler: Focused on model monitoring and observability, with responsible AI metrics and guardrails; public pricing is available. - Modulos: Focused on governance and compliance artifacts rather than primary observability features.

Market share / adoption trends

The vendor reports adoption by a growing set of organizations. Independent market share data was not found in the sources reviewed.

	Modulos	IBM watsonx.governance	Monitaur
Starting Price	Free Starter Plan available; paid pricing not public	Public pricing shown (usage/resource-unit based for SaaS)	Not publicly listed (contact vendor)
Primary use case	Multi-framework AI governance with controls/evidence workflows; EU AI Act / ISO 42001 readiness	Large enterprises standardizing governance across hybrid cloud; IBM ecosystem fit	Regulated enterprises seeking policy-to-proof governance flows
Key product emphasis	Governance graph linking requirements→controls→evidence; AI-based agents; quantitative risk framing	Enterprise scale, hybrid deployment options, published pricing mechanics	Policy-to-proof lifecycle and regulated-industry focus
Key limitations (publicly observable)	Limited independent reviews; pricing opacity for paid tiers; integration depth should be validated	Potential platform complexity and procurement overhead for some organizations	Industry-focused positioning may be less compelling outside core verticals; pricing not public

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Modulos vs IBM watsonx.governance

IBM: Published pricing structure and established enterprise ecosystem integration. Broad enterprise credibility and procurement familiarity.
Modulos: Focused on multi-framework mappings and controls/evidence workflows with an entry-level free offering. Potentially a lighter-entry specialist for EU AI Act and ISO 42001 workflows.
Decision driver: Organizations seeking a broad enterprise governance suite integrated with an incumbent vendor ecosystem may favor IBM; organizations seeking a focused compliance/workflow tool oriented to EU AI Act / ISO 42001 may evaluate Modulos.

Modulos vs Monitaur

Monitaur: Emphasizes policy-to-proof lifecycle and regulated-industry validation.
Modulos: Emphasizes multi-framework mappings and AI-supported governance workflows.
Decision driver: Organizational governance operating model maturity and required depth of assurance vs compliance documentation will influence vendor choice.

Modulos vs Fiddler (adjacent)

Fiddler: Focused on model monitoring and observability, with responsible AI metrics and guardrails; public pricing is available.
Modulos: Focused on governance and compliance artifacts rather than primary observability features.

Market share / adoption trends

The vendor reports adoption by a growing set of organizations. Independent market share data was not found in the sources reviewed.

	Modulos	IBM watsonx.governance	Monitaur
Starting Price	Free Starter Plan available; paid pricing not public	Public pricing shown (usage/resource-unit based for SaaS)	Not publicly listed (contact vendor)
Primary use case	Multi-framework AI governance with controls/evidence workflows; EU AI Act / ISO 42001 readiness	Large enterprises standardizing governance across hybrid cloud; IBM ecosystem fit	Regulated enterprises seeking policy-to-proof governance flows
Key product emphasis	Governance graph linking requirements→controls→evidence; AI-based agents; quantitative risk framing	Enterprise scale, hybrid deployment options, published pricing mechanics	Policy-to-proof lifecycle and regulated-industry focus
Key limitations (publicly observable)	Limited independent reviews; pricing opacity for paid tiers; integration depth should be validated	Potential platform complexity and procurement overhead for some organizations	Industry-focused positioning may be less compelling outside core verticals; pricing not public