MRPeasy

Name: MRPeasy
Brand: MRPeasy

MRPeasy is a cloud MRP/manufacturing ERP that consolidates production planning, inventory, purchasing, sales/order flow, shop-floor reporting, and basic finance visibility into a single SaaS system for small manufacturers.

Est 2014|Raised $110K|95 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 3K|Website|FTEs 35|HQ Bristol, England, GB

MarketsProduction Planning ERP

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- MRPeasy vs Katana - Pricing model is a primary difference: MRPeasy is commonly referenced as per-seat pricing, while Katana is often presented as plan-based pricing that can include broader user allowances depending on the plan. The comparative cost-effectiveness depends on team size and required features. - Community discussions and comparison articles indicate that the cost crossover point varies by scenario; some users switch platforms when pricing or feature changes in competing products alter total cost. - MRPeasy vs Odoo / ERPNext - Community discussions generally frame Odoo and ERPNext as more flexible but heavier to implement, whereas MRPeasy is more purpose-built for small manufacturing operations and may be faster to deploy with less customization. - MRPeasy vs Unleashed / Fishbowl - Different tools emphasize different trade-offs (e.g., Unleashed on inventory management, Fishbowl on inventory/manufacturing tracking with on-prem options). This report did not find sufficient direct quantitative user comparisons to definitively rank MRPeasy relative to Fishbowl in most scenarios.

	MRPeasy	Katana Cloud Inventory	Odoo (Manufacturing)
Starting Price	Published per-seat pricing (referenced in third-party sources)	Often presented as flat per-plan pricing; third-party references vary by version and region	Open-source / modular; total cost depends on hosting, paid modules, and implementation
Best For	Small manufacturers needing integrated planning, purchasing, inventory, and basic finance visibility	Product-centric makers who prioritize visual production scheduling and e-commerce integration	Organizations needing a wide range of modules and tolerance for implementation/configuration effort
Key Strength	Broad set of manufacturing workflows for SMBs; commonly used integrations (Shopify, QuickBooks/Xero)	Visual scheduling UX; plan models that may include unlimited users depending on tier	Flexibility and extensibility; large ecosystem and ability to scale into finance/CRM needs
Key Weakness	Per-seat pricing that scales with headcount; API access commonly gated to higher plans; some users report UX and feature-depth limitations	Add-on modules and plan differences can raise total cost of ownership for advanced functionality	Implementation complexity and potential customization costs

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

MRPeasy vs Katana
- Pricing model is a primary difference: MRPeasy is commonly referenced as per-seat pricing, while Katana is often presented as plan-based pricing that can include broader user allowances depending on the plan. The comparative cost-effectiveness depends on team size and required features.
- Community discussions and comparison articles indicate that the cost crossover point varies by scenario; some users switch platforms when pricing or feature changes in competing products alter total cost.
MRPeasy vs Odoo / ERPNext
- Community discussions generally frame Odoo and ERPNext as more flexible but heavier to implement, whereas MRPeasy is more purpose-built for small manufacturing operations and may be faster to deploy with less customization.
MRPeasy vs Unleashed / Fishbowl
- Different tools emphasize different trade-offs (e.g., Unleashed on inventory management, Fishbowl on inventory/manufacturing tracking with on-prem options). This report did not find sufficient direct quantitative user comparisons to definitively rank MRPeasy relative to Fishbowl in most scenarios.

	MRPeasy	Katana Cloud Inventory	Odoo (Manufacturing)
Starting Price	Published per-seat pricing (referenced in third-party sources)	Often presented as flat per-plan pricing; third-party references vary by version and region	Open-source / modular; total cost depends on hosting, paid modules, and implementation
Best For	Small manufacturers needing integrated planning, purchasing, inventory, and basic finance visibility	Product-centric makers who prioritize visual production scheduling and e-commerce integration	Organizations needing a wide range of modules and tolerance for implementation/configuration effort
Key Strength	Broad set of manufacturing workflows for SMBs; commonly used integrations (Shopify, QuickBooks/Xero)	Visual scheduling UX; plan models that may include unlimited users depending on tier	Flexibility and extensibility; large ecosystem and ability to scale into finance/CRM needs
Key Weakness	Per-seat pricing that scales with headcount; API access commonly gated to higher plans; some users report UX and feature-depth limitations	Add-on modules and plan differences can raise total cost of ownership for advanced functionality	Implementation complexity and potential customization costs