The MVMNT Group

Name: The MVMNT Group
Brand: The MVMNT Group

AI Native

The Next Gen TMS

Est 2020|Raised $24.7M

LinkedIn 3K|Website|FTEs 29|HQ Chicago, Illinois, US

MarketsFreight Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Where MVMNT may perform well: - Vendor materials emphasize expedited onboarding and a modern broker-focused interface. - The existence of a status page and product update pages indicate active product maintenance and public operational transparency. - Integration capabilities (API/webhooks/EDI) and a partner ecosystem are important parts of the vendor narrative. - Where competitors may be preferable: - AscendTMS is frequently cited for cost-sensitive buyers and has substantial community discussion among brokers. - Turvo targets organizations that require a broader collaboration network and can support enterprise-level spending. - Rose Rocket and other competitors emphasize configurability and may be more appropriate for complex, multi-branch operations.

Market adoption signals

Press coverage of a Series A provides a signal of investor interest.
Public social follower counts and a public status page suggest an active product, but these signals do not substitute for verifiable customer counts or independent user satisfaction data.

	MVMNT (freight TMS)	AscendTMS	Turvo
Starting Price	Free tier available; vendor lists published per-seat and annual plan pricing on product pages and in press materials; vendor has also referenced example bundle pricing in press materials	Public third-party pricing lists show a range of published monthly plans (phrasing and billing varies by source)	Vendor pricing page indicates enterprise-level starting prices that are notably higher than typical seat-based SaaS
Best For	Freight brokerages seeking a modern interface, expedited onboarding, integrations, and automation capabilities	Smaller brokerages and cost-sensitive teams looking for broadly functional TMS features	Larger shippers and 3PLs needing a collaboration and visibility platform and that can commit to enterprise pricing
Key Strength	Broker-focused workflows combined with automation and integrations; explicit add-on pricing referenced for EDI and migration	Perceived cost-effectiveness and broad feature set; significant community references in broker channels	Collaboration and visibility features at enterprise scale; onboarding and support included in enterprise engagements
Key Weakness	Limited third-party review depth; pricing/packaging clarity issues; public documentation of security certifications not found	Can become costly as usage and complexity grow; certain advanced workflows may be limited depending on configuration	Higher-starting price that may be unsuitable for smaller brokerages

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where MVMNT may perform well:
- Vendor materials emphasize expedited onboarding and a modern broker-focused interface.
- The existence of a status page and product update pages indicate active product maintenance and public operational transparency.
- Integration capabilities (API/webhooks/EDI) and a partner ecosystem are important parts of the vendor narrative.
Where competitors may be preferable:
- AscendTMS is frequently cited for cost-sensitive buyers and has substantial community discussion among brokers.
- Turvo targets organizations that require a broader collaboration network and can support enterprise-level spending.
- Rose Rocket and other competitors emphasize configurability and may be more appropriate for complex, multi-branch operations.

Market adoption signals

Press coverage of a Series A provides a signal of investor interest.
Public social follower counts and a public status page suggest an active product, but these signals do not substitute for verifiable customer counts or independent user satisfaction data.

	MVMNT (freight TMS)	AscendTMS	Turvo
Starting Price	Free tier available; vendor lists published per-seat and annual plan pricing on product pages and in press materials; vendor has also referenced example bundle pricing in press materials	Public third-party pricing lists show a range of published monthly plans (phrasing and billing varies by source)	Vendor pricing page indicates enterprise-level starting prices that are notably higher than typical seat-based SaaS
Best For	Freight brokerages seeking a modern interface, expedited onboarding, integrations, and automation capabilities	Smaller brokerages and cost-sensitive teams looking for broadly functional TMS features	Larger shippers and 3PLs needing a collaboration and visibility platform and that can commit to enterprise pricing
Key Strength	Broker-focused workflows combined with automation and integrations; explicit add-on pricing referenced for EDI and migration	Perceived cost-effectiveness and broad feature set; significant community references in broker channels	Collaboration and visibility features at enterprise scale; onboarding and support included in enterprise engagements
Key Weakness	Limited third-party review depth; pricing/packaging clarity issues; public documentation of security certifications not found	Can become costly as usage and complexity grow; certain advanced workflows may be limited depending on configuration	Higher-starting price that may be unsuitable for smaller brokerages