MyInterview

Name: MyInterview
Brand: MyInterview
Rating: 4.7 (145 reviews)

Powerful AI. Personal Touch.

Est 2014|Raised $18.2M|23 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 6K|Web traffic 99K|FTEs 32|HQ New York, New York, US

MarketsInterviewing & Assessment

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- myInterview vs HireVue: HireVue is positioned for enterprise customers and presents compliance/security claims in its public materials. myInterview is oriented toward SMBs and midmarket teams with a simpler onboarding proposition; public security documentation for myInterview is less visible in the pages reviewed. - myInterview vs Willo: third-party comparisons indicate Willo differentiates with identity-check options and certain plan features (for example, unlimited users in some packages). Verify specific plan details directly with each vendor. - myInterview vs Truffle (competitor-authored content): competitor material frames myInterview as a viable asynchronous video tool but suggests that more advanced features may require higher tiers. Treat competitor-authored analyses as directional and validate directly with vendor documentation.

	myInterview	HireVue	Willo
Starting Price	Free tier exists (vendor marketing). Paid tiers reported starting at a low monthly cost (third-party source; verify on vendor site).	Custom/enterprise; pricing typically requires a demo and can be expensive for smaller teams.	Entry pricing varies by source; some third-party sites list low-to-moderate monthly prices.
Typical Buyer Profile	SMB–midmarket and teams doing high-volume screening seeking a candidate-facing async option and ATS integrations.	Large enterprises that require governance, assessments, and explicit compliance documentation.	Teams prioritizing structured evaluation and collaboration; some plans include identity checks.
Key Strengths	Asynchronous video interviewing, positive average ratings on review sites, and available integrations (Workable/Greenhouse) and API.	Emphasis on compliance and governance, with documented security claims in vendor materials (e.g., SOC 2, ISO).	Competitive packaging for collaboration and add-ons such as identity verification (per third-party comparisons).
Key Weaknesses	Mixed feedback on support/billing; perceived pricing relative to some competitors; public security certifications less visible in reviewed pages.	Typically expensive and sales-led; may be excessive for SMB needs.	Feature coverage and pricing comparisons vary by plan; verify directly for specific requirements.

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

myInterview vs HireVue: HireVue is positioned for enterprise customers and presents compliance/security claims in its public materials. myInterview is oriented toward SMBs and midmarket teams with a simpler onboarding proposition; public security documentation for myInterview is less visible in the pages reviewed.
myInterview vs Willo: third-party comparisons indicate Willo differentiates with identity-check options and certain plan features (for example, unlimited users in some packages). Verify specific plan details directly with each vendor.
myInterview vs Truffle (competitor-authored content): competitor material frames myInterview as a viable asynchronous video tool but suggests that more advanced features may require higher tiers. Treat competitor-authored analyses as directional and validate directly with vendor documentation.

	myInterview	HireVue	Willo
Starting Price	Free tier exists (vendor marketing). Paid tiers reported starting at a low monthly cost (third-party source; verify on vendor site).	Custom/enterprise; pricing typically requires a demo and can be expensive for smaller teams.	Entry pricing varies by source; some third-party sites list low-to-moderate monthly prices.
Typical Buyer Profile	SMB–midmarket and teams doing high-volume screening seeking a candidate-facing async option and ATS integrations.	Large enterprises that require governance, assessments, and explicit compliance documentation.	Teams prioritizing structured evaluation and collaboration; some plans include identity checks.
Key Strengths	Asynchronous video interviewing, positive average ratings on review sites, and available integrations (Workable/Greenhouse) and API.	Emphasis on compliance and governance, with documented security claims in vendor materials (e.g., SOC 2, ISO).	Competitive packaging for collaboration and add-ons such as identity verification (per third-party comparisons).
Key Weaknesses	Mixed feedback on support/billing; perceived pricing relative to some competitors; public security certifications less visible in reviewed pages.	Typically expensive and sales-led; may be excessive for SMB needs.	Feature coverage and pricing comparisons vary by plan; verify directly for specific requirements.