N-able Data Retention

Name: N-able Data Retention
Brand: N-able Technologies
Rating: 4.6 (675 reviews)

Leader

Enhance your reputation by delivering the RMM, security, and data protection solutions that make you indispensable.

Est 2000|Valuation $929.4M|Raised $1.2B

LinkedIn 75K|Website|Web traffic 521K|FTEs 1,978|HQ Burlington, MA

MarketsBackup and Data Protection

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Areas where Cove tends to meet MSP requirements: management features for multi-tenant environments, cloud-based storage options, and retention policy controls designed for service provider contexts. - Areas where competitors commonly differentiate: - Veeam: extensive workload support and a broad ecosystem for backups and restores. - Rubrik/Commvault: enterprise governance, compliance reporting and policy controls that appeal to larger organizations. - Acronis/Datto: bundled MSP features and appliance options (Datto) that address specific BCDR preferences.

Customer testimonials comparing against competitors

Third-party analyses and community commentary often reference Veeam as a benchmark for Microsoft 365 coverage and restore capabilities; historical community posts also compare retention and coverage gaps across vendors. These comparisons are frequently anecdotal and should be validated through technical evaluation.

Adoption trends / market signals

Analyst commentary positions N-able as an established MSP channel vendor with reported revenue contribution from Cove; specific market-share metrics and growth figures should be validated against primary analyst reports and vendor disclosures.

	N-able (Cove Data Protection retention)	Veeam (incl. Veeam for M365)	Acronis Cyber Protect
Starting Price	Quote-based / channel-led; typically device-based with included pooled storage	Varies by edition and deployment; licensing and infrastructure can be capacity-driven	Licensing varies by edition and provider; can be per-workload, per-GB or per-device depending on offering
Best For	MSPs seeking a multi-tenant, cloud-oriented backup solution with retention policy support	Organizations seeking broad workload support, mature restore tooling and an established ecosystem	MSPs seeking backup integrated with security features (backup + security bundle)
Key Strength	Operational simplicity for multi-tenant operations and cloud-based storage options oriented to MSPs	Feature depth, broad workload support, and a large installed base with mature tooling	Integrated backup and security capabilities in a single product family
Key Weakness	Reporting capabilities have been cited as limited by reviewers; community discussion shows packaging/contract clarity issues	Can require more infrastructure and have complex licensing for some deployments; may be higher cost at scale	Bundle approach can be heavy depending on the required feature set and the chosen edition

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Areas where Cove tends to meet MSP requirements: management features for multi-tenant environments, cloud-based storage options, and retention policy controls designed for service provider contexts.
Areas where competitors commonly differentiate:
- Veeam: extensive workload support and a broad ecosystem for backups and restores.
- Rubrik/Commvault: enterprise governance, compliance reporting and policy controls that appeal to larger organizations.
- Acronis/Datto: bundled MSP features and appliance options (Datto) that address specific BCDR preferences.

Customer testimonials comparing against competitors

Third-party analyses and community commentary often reference Veeam as a benchmark for Microsoft 365 coverage and restore capabilities; historical community posts also compare retention and coverage gaps across vendors. These comparisons are frequently anecdotal and should be validated through technical evaluation.

Adoption trends / market signals

Analyst commentary positions N-able as an established MSP channel vendor with reported revenue contribution from Cove; specific market-share metrics and growth figures should be validated against primary analyst reports and vendor disclosures.

	N-able (Cove Data Protection retention)	Veeam (incl. Veeam for M365)	Acronis Cyber Protect
Starting Price	Quote-based / channel-led; typically device-based with included pooled storage	Varies by edition and deployment; licensing and infrastructure can be capacity-driven	Licensing varies by edition and provider; can be per-workload, per-GB or per-device depending on offering
Best For	MSPs seeking a multi-tenant, cloud-oriented backup solution with retention policy support	Organizations seeking broad workload support, mature restore tooling and an established ecosystem	MSPs seeking backup integrated with security features (backup + security bundle)
Key Strength	Operational simplicity for multi-tenant operations and cloud-based storage options oriented to MSPs	Feature depth, broad workload support, and a large installed base with mature tooling	Integrated backup and security capabilities in a single product family
Key Weakness	Reporting capabilities have been cited as limited by reviewers; community discussion shows packaging/contract clarity issues	Can require more infrastructure and have complex licensing for some deployments; may be higher cost at scale	Bundle approach can be heavy depending on the required feature set and the chosen edition