N-able Disaster Recovery

Name: N-able Disaster Recovery
Brand: N-able Technologies
Rating: 4.5 (677 reviews)

Leader

Enhance your reputation by delivering the RMM, security, and data protection solutions that make you indispensable.

Est 2000|Valuation $967.2M|Raised $1.2B

LinkedIn 75K|Website|Web traffic 521K|FTEs 1,978|HQ Burlington, MA

MarketsBackup and Data Protection

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- N-able vs Datto BCDR: Datto is known for an appliance-first approach with local virtualization and packaged DR appliances; N-able promotes a cloud-first, appliance-free model. Buyers who prioritize local instant virtualization via on-prem appliances may consider Datto. - N-able vs Veeam: Veeam is often perceived as a standard in VM backup for enterprise environments; N-able provides a more packaged MSP SaaS experience. Selection depends on desired operational model and ecosystem requirements. - N-able vs Acronis: Acronis combines backup and security features in one platform. Organizations wanting integrated security controls plus backup may evaluate Acronis, weighing trade-offs in pricing and complexity.

Customer comparisons reported in community forums

Community posts reflect a range of opinions: some users recommend alternatives where local appliance-driven failover or particular support models are required; others retain Cove for its operational fit within their MSP environment.

	N-able Cove Data Protection (DR capabilities)	Veeam (via VCSP / Veeam Data Cloud)	Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud (MSP)
Starting Price	Quote-based; vendor publishes per-workload and per-user pricing; storage and exact costs require a formal quote from the vendor	Vendor publishes SaaS pricing for some offerings; partner/VCSP pricing varies by provider and may require quotes	Partner/quote-based; multiple licensing models (per-workload or capacity-based) are offered; DR pricing may include capacity-based elements
Primary Market	MSPs seeking cloud-first backup and DR without appliance management	MSPs and IT teams needing extensive ecosystem integrations and broad enterprise adoption	MSPs seeking integrated backup and cyber protection features in a single platform
Key Strength	Multi-tenant operations, cloud-first architecture, and incremental efficiency	Broad industry adoption, mature VM backup heritage, extensive partner ecosystem	Feature breadth (backup + security), multiple licensing options
Key Weakness	Perceptions of pricing complexity and variable support experience	Dependency on partner implementations and potential design complexity	Pricing and bundling complexity depending on chosen options

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

N-able vs Datto BCDR: Datto is known for an appliance-first approach with local virtualization and packaged DR appliances; N-able promotes a cloud-first, appliance-free model. Buyers who prioritize local instant virtualization via on-prem appliances may consider Datto.
N-able vs Veeam: Veeam is often perceived as a standard in VM backup for enterprise environments; N-able provides a more packaged MSP SaaS experience. Selection depends on desired operational model and ecosystem requirements.
N-able vs Acronis: Acronis combines backup and security features in one platform. Organizations wanting integrated security controls plus backup may evaluate Acronis, weighing trade-offs in pricing and complexity.

Customer comparisons reported in community forums

	N-able Cove Data Protection (DR capabilities)	Veeam (via VCSP / Veeam Data Cloud)	Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud (MSP)
Starting Price	Quote-based; vendor publishes per-workload and per-user pricing; storage and exact costs require a formal quote from the vendor	Vendor publishes SaaS pricing for some offerings; partner/VCSP pricing varies by provider and may require quotes	Partner/quote-based; multiple licensing models (per-workload or capacity-based) are offered; DR pricing may include capacity-based elements
Primary Market	MSPs seeking cloud-first backup and DR without appliance management	MSPs and IT teams needing extensive ecosystem integrations and broad enterprise adoption	MSPs seeking integrated backup and cyber protection features in a single platform
Key Strength	Multi-tenant operations, cloud-first architecture, and incremental efficiency	Broad industry adoption, mature VM backup heritage, extensive partner ecosystem	Feature breadth (backup + security), multiple licensing options
Key Weakness	Perceptions of pricing complexity and variable support experience	Dependency on partner implementations and potential design complexity	Pricing and bundling complexity depending on chosen options