Naverisk

Name: Naverisk
Brand: Naverisk
Rating: 4.8 (168 reviews)

Slash your costs and simplify service delivery with a powerful, easy to use, all-in-one IT services automation suite.

Est 2007|9 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 732|Web traffic 15K|FTEs 25|HQ Auckland, Auckland, NZ

MarketsIT Service Desk (ITSM)Endpoint Management (UEM)

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | Naverisk | NinjaOne | Atera | |--------|----------|----------|-------| | Starting Price | Starting at $110/month (vendor-published) | Quote-based; public estimates often cite ~$3/endpoint/month starting (third-party review) | Per-technician pricing; unlimited endpoints per technician (vendor-published) | | Best For | MSPs wanting an all-in-one RMM + service desk + PSA bundle, including on-prem option | Teams prioritizing modern UI, strong support reputation, and RMM-first operational polish | Smaller MSPs/IT teams who benefit from predictable per-tech pricing for many endpoints | | Key Strength | Consolidated platform; cloud or on-prem; integrated backup proposition | Ease of use / modern UX and strong customer support reputation (per third-party reviews) | Pricing model simplicity (per technician), especially when endpoint count is high | | Key Weakness | PSA may not meet all MSP needs; GUI critiques; integration breadth may trail ecosystem leaders | Can be perceived as expensive at scale or depending on bundles/modules; quote opacity | Feature maturity / depth can lag more enterprise-focused RMMs; add-ons and tier packaging changes can create “effective price increases” | - Direct competitors and their differentiators - ConnectWise (RMM + PSA + remote control ecosystem) - Strength: broad MSP ecosystem; deep PSA offerings (depending on bundle). - Weakness: pricing often quote-based; implementation and complexity can be high. - Datto RMM - Strength: widely used in MSP space; strong automation scripting and integrations with Datto/Kaseya ecosystem. - Weakness: pricing often requires request/quote; ecosystem changes under parent ownership can concern buyers. - N-able (N-central) - Strength: strong monitoring and automation; on-prem options exist for N-central. - Weakness: pricing/packaging complexity; user experience varies. - Feature comparison: where Naverisk appears to excel vs lag behind - Appears to excel - On-prem/self-host option (valued by some reviewers) - Consolidated “suite” approach: RMM + service desk + PSA in one package - Data/reporting focus (Data Hub, query builder) - Potential lag areas (based on review themes) - PSA depth vs dedicated PSA leaders - UI/UX modernization compared to newer RMM entrants - Pricing comparison: value proposition vs alternatives - Naverisk - Transparent published entry price and “one price” framing can simplify early evaluation. - Backup messaging can be compelling, but storage costs (Wasabi) and promos require careful modeling. - Atera - Per-technician pricing can be cheaper or more expensive depending on endpoints-per-tech ratio. - NinjaOne / ConnectWise / Datto - Often quote-based; price can vary widely by volume and bundle. - Customer testimonials comparing Naverisk to competitors - Reddit examples indicate evaluation as a replacement for Syncro and comparisons to N-able RMM; also mention scenarios where Naverisk is used for RMM but PSA chosen elsewhere. - Market share and adoption trends - Naverisk claims “trusted by 1000’s” but this is not independently verified in this research. - Capterra and G2 review counts (97 on Capterra; 72 on G2) indicate some market presence but not necessarily leadership versus larger incumbents.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	Naverisk	NinjaOne	Atera
Starting Price	Starting at $110/month (vendor-published)	Quote-based; public estimates often cite ~$3/endpoint/month starting (third-party review)	Per-technician pricing; unlimited endpoints per technician (vendor-published)
Best For	MSPs wanting an all-in-one RMM + service desk + PSA bundle, including on-prem option	Teams prioritizing modern UI, strong support reputation, and RMM-first operational polish	Smaller MSPs/IT teams who benefit from predictable per-tech pricing for many endpoints
Key Strength	Consolidated platform; cloud or on-prem; integrated backup proposition	Ease of use / modern UX and strong customer support reputation (per third-party reviews)	Pricing model simplicity (per technician), especially when endpoint count is high
Key Weakness	PSA may not meet all MSP needs; GUI critiques; integration breadth may trail ecosystem leaders	Can be perceived as expensive at scale or depending on bundles/modules; quote opacity	Feature maturity / depth can lag more enterprise-focused RMMs; add-ons and tier packaging changes can create “effective price increases”

Direct competitors and their differentiators
- ConnectWise (RMM + PSA + remote control ecosystem)
  - Strength: broad MSP ecosystem; deep PSA offerings (depending on bundle).
  - Weakness: pricing often quote-based; implementation and complexity can be high.
- Datto RMM
  - Strength: widely used in MSP space; strong automation scripting and integrations with Datto/Kaseya ecosystem.
  - Weakness: pricing often requires request/quote; ecosystem changes under parent ownership can concern buyers.
- N-able (N-central)
  - Strength: strong monitoring and automation; on-prem options exist for N-central.
  - Weakness: pricing/packaging complexity; user experience varies.
Feature comparison: where Naverisk appears to excel vs lag behind
- Appears to excel
  - On-prem/self-host option (valued by some reviewers)
  - Consolidated “suite” approach: RMM + service desk + PSA in one package
  - Data/reporting focus (Data Hub, query builder)
- Potential lag areas (based on review themes)
  - PSA depth vs dedicated PSA leaders
  - UI/UX modernization compared to newer RMM entrants
Pricing comparison: value proposition vs alternatives
- Naverisk
  - Transparent published entry price and “one price” framing can simplify early evaluation.
  - Backup messaging can be compelling, but storage costs (Wasabi) and promos require careful modeling.
- Atera
  - Per-technician pricing can be cheaper or more expensive depending on endpoints-per-tech ratio.
- NinjaOne / ConnectWise / Datto
  - Often quote-based; price can vary widely by volume and bundle.
Customer testimonials comparing Naverisk to competitors
- Reddit examples indicate evaluation as a replacement for Syncro and comparisons to N-able RMM; also mention scenarios where Naverisk is used for RMM but PSA chosen elsewhere.
Market share and adoption trends
- Naverisk claims “trusted by 1000’s” but this is not independently verified in this research.
- Capterra and G2 review counts (97 on Capterra; 72 on G2) indicate some market presence but not necessarily leadership versus larger incumbents.

Aspect

Naverisk

NinjaOne

Atera

Starting Price

Starting at $110/month (vendor-published)

Quote-based; public estimates often cite ~$3/endpoint/month starting (third-party review)

Per-technician pricing; unlimited endpoints per technician (vendor-published)

Best For

MSPs wanting an all-in-one RMM + service desk + PSA bundle, including on-prem option

Teams prioritizing modern UI, strong support reputation, and RMM-first operational polish

Smaller MSPs/IT teams who benefit from predictable per-tech pricing for many endpoints

Key Strength

Consolidated platform; cloud or on-prem; integrated backup proposition

Ease of use / modern UX and strong customer support reputation (per third-party reviews)

Pricing model simplicity (per technician), especially when endpoint count is high

Key Weakness

PSA may not meet all MSP needs; GUI critiques; integration breadth may trail ecosystem leaders

Can be perceived as expensive at scale or depending on bundles/modules; quote opacity

Feature maturity / depth can lag more enterprise-focused RMMs; add-ons and tier packaging changes can create “effective price increases”