Neobrain

Name: Neobrain
Brand: NEOBRAIN

The right skill, in the right place, at the right time. In a nutshell.

Est 2017|Valuation $77.9M|Raised $33.8M|10 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 10K|Web traffic 11K|FTEs 50|HQ Paris, Île-de-France, FR

MarketsCareer Pathing & Succession Planning HR Analytics & Workforce Planning

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Neobrain vs 365Talents: - Comparison summaries suggest differences in ease-of-use and administration priorities; some reviewers indicate preferences based on specific needs (for example, admin vs end-user ease). - 365Talents emphasizes Microsoft Teams integration in its messaging and highlights large-scale deployments in marketing materials. - Neobrain vs Gloat: - Press coverage on Gloat highlights substantial funding and broad market visibility. Neobrain is presented with stronger Europe-centric roots and customer references; Gloat has broader global press coverage.

Market share / adoption trends

- The vendor publishes claims of multiple major accounts and broad employee coverage in its materials. - Competitors publish varying aggregate employee coverage and adoption claims in their marketing materials. - Press coverage and funding disclosures for other vendors indicate differing scales and investment profiles that are not directly comparable across vendors. These figures are vendor-published and were not independently audited. Buyers should validate claims via customer references.

	Neobrain	365Talents	Gloat
Starting Price	Quote-based; contact-for-pricing in comparison listings	Quote-based; contact-for-pricing on vendor pages	Quote-based; no transparent list pricing in captured sources
Typical Fit	Enterprises seeking a skills and internal marketplace layer that integrates with HRIS	Enterprises emphasizing skills architecture and talent marketplace at scale	Large enterprises seeking an internal marketplace for roles/projects/mentorship/learning
Reported Strengths (based on reviewer comments)	Reviewers cite employee profiles, career paths, and opportunity matching; vendor emphasizes integrations with SAP/Workday	Vendor messaging emphasizes skills architecture and integrations (e.g., Microsoft Teams)	Vendor has broad market visibility and extensive press coverage
Reported Weaknesses (based on reviewer comments)	Manager UX concerns; product changes without customer notification; limited public documentation of third-party certifications	Pricing transparency limited; admin burden depends on taxonomy and governance	Enterprise complexity and rollout effort; pricing not transparent

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Neobrain vs 365Talents:
- Comparison summaries suggest differences in ease-of-use and administration priorities; some reviewers indicate preferences based on specific needs (for example, admin vs end-user ease).
- 365Talents emphasizes Microsoft Teams integration in its messaging and highlights large-scale deployments in marketing materials.
Neobrain vs Gloat:
- Press coverage on Gloat highlights substantial funding and broad market visibility. Neobrain is presented with stronger Europe-centric roots and customer references; Gloat has broader global press coverage.

Market share / adoption trends

The vendor publishes claims of multiple major accounts and broad employee coverage in its materials.
Competitors publish varying aggregate employee coverage and adoption claims in their marketing materials.
Press coverage and funding disclosures for other vendors indicate differing scales and investment profiles that are not directly comparable across vendors.

These figures are vendor-published and were not independently audited. Buyers should validate claims via customer references.

	Neobrain	365Talents	Gloat
Starting Price	Quote-based; contact-for-pricing in comparison listings	Quote-based; contact-for-pricing on vendor pages	Quote-based; no transparent list pricing in captured sources
Typical Fit	Enterprises seeking a skills and internal marketplace layer that integrates with HRIS	Enterprises emphasizing skills architecture and talent marketplace at scale	Large enterprises seeking an internal marketplace for roles/projects/mentorship/learning
Reported Strengths (based on reviewer comments)	Reviewers cite employee profiles, career paths, and opportunity matching; vendor emphasizes integrations with SAP/Workday	Vendor messaging emphasizes skills architecture and integrations (e.g., Microsoft Teams)	Vendor has broad market visibility and extensive press coverage
Reported Weaknesses (based on reviewer comments)	Manager UX concerns; product changes without customer notification; limited public documentation of third-party certifications	Pricing transparency limited; admin burden depends on taxonomy and governance	Enterprise complexity and rollout effort; pricing not transparent