Netmaker

Name: Netmaker
Brand: Netmaker

AI Native

Zero Trust networks with WireGuard.

Est 2021|Valuation $7.1M|Raised $2.8M|18 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 1K|Website|Web traffic 20K|FTEs 10|HQ Candler, North Carolina, US

MarketsEnterprise Networking

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | Netmaker | Tailscale | ZeroTier | |--------|----------|-----------|----------| | Starting Price | Community: free (open source). Professional: base fee shown ($100 up to 200 users; $500 up to 500; $1000 unlimited) + hourly usage rates for hosts/networks | Seat-based pricing (vendor states seat-based model; exact current price depends on plan) | Pricing varies by tier; ZeroTier publishes pricing docs and has had notable plan changes historically | | Best For | Teams wanting WireGuard-based overlay with a self-host option and more network-control primitives (gateways, segmentation) | Teams prioritizing ease-of-use, polished UX, and managed experience | Organizations wanting overlay networking with a mature ecosystem; use cases tolerant of pricing plan shifts | | Key Strength | Self-host flexibility + WireGuard-based performance focus + multi-network segmentation | Usability, onboarding, ecosystem maturity, DNS/identity polish | Mature product; broad platform support; simple conceptual model | | Key Weakness | Higher operational burden; community reports of setup/upgrade friction; smaller review footprint on major platforms | Vendor reliance for control plane (officially); seat-based billing can penalize large but lightly-active user bases | Pricing volatility concerns in community; protocol is not WireGuard (may matter for security/performance perceptions) | - Narrative analysis - Netmaker vs Tailscale - Netmaker emphasizes control and self-hosting with WireGuard-based performance. - Tailscale emphasizes simplicity and enterprise packaging, but uses seat-based pricing according to its pricing page. - Netmaker vs ZeroTier - Netmaker positions around WireGuard and “zero trust” policy features. - ZeroTier community commentary includes complaints about pricing changes and higher costs per device at scale; this can push cost-sensitive users toward alternatives. - Adoption trends - Netmaker claims “500+ companies worldwide” (vendor claim). - Review-platform presence (G2/TrustRadius/Gartner Peer Insights) for Netmaker appears limited or not easily accessible, reducing clear third-party evidence of adoption compared to larger rivals.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	Netmaker	Tailscale	ZeroTier
Starting Price	Community: free (open source). Professional: base fee shown ($100 up to 200 users; $500 up to 500; $1000 unlimited) + hourly usage rates for hosts/networks	Seat-based pricing (vendor states seat-based model; exact current price depends on plan)	Pricing varies by tier; ZeroTier publishes pricing docs and has had notable plan changes historically
Best For	Teams wanting WireGuard-based overlay with a self-host option and more network-control primitives (gateways, segmentation)	Teams prioritizing ease-of-use, polished UX, and managed experience	Organizations wanting overlay networking with a mature ecosystem; use cases tolerant of pricing plan shifts
Key Strength	Self-host flexibility + WireGuard-based performance focus + multi-network segmentation	Usability, onboarding, ecosystem maturity, DNS/identity polish	Mature product; broad platform support; simple conceptual model
Key Weakness	Higher operational burden; community reports of setup/upgrade friction; smaller review footprint on major platforms	Vendor reliance for control plane (officially); seat-based billing can penalize large but lightly-active user bases	Pricing volatility concerns in community; protocol is not WireGuard (may matter for security/performance perceptions)

Narrative analysis
- Netmaker vs Tailscale
  - Netmaker emphasizes control and self-hosting with WireGuard-based performance.
  - Tailscale emphasizes simplicity and enterprise packaging, but uses seat-based pricing according to its pricing page.
- Netmaker vs ZeroTier
  - Netmaker positions around WireGuard and “zero trust” policy features.
  - ZeroTier community commentary includes complaints about pricing changes and higher costs per device at scale; this can push cost-sensitive users toward alternatives.
- Adoption trends
  - Netmaker claims “500+ companies worldwide” (vendor claim).
  - Review-platform presence (G2/TrustRadius/Gartner Peer Insights) for Netmaker appears limited or not easily accessible, reducing clear third-party evidence of adoption compared to larger rivals.

Aspect

Netmaker

Tailscale

ZeroTier

Starting Price

Community: free (open source). Professional: base fee shown ($100 up to 200 users; $500 up to 500; $1000 unlimited) + hourly usage rates for hosts/networks

Seat-based pricing (vendor states seat-based model; exact current price depends on plan)

Pricing varies by tier; ZeroTier publishes pricing docs and has had notable plan changes historically

Best For

Teams wanting WireGuard-based overlay with a self-host option and more network-control primitives (gateways, segmentation)

Teams prioritizing ease-of-use, polished UX, and managed experience

Organizations wanting overlay networking with a mature ecosystem; use cases tolerant of pricing plan shifts

Key Strength

Self-host flexibility + WireGuard-based performance focus + multi-network segmentation

Usability, onboarding, ecosystem maturity, DNS/identity polish

Mature product; broad platform support; simple conceptual model

Key Weakness

Higher operational burden; community reports of setup/upgrade friction; smaller review footprint on major platforms

Vendor reliance for control plane (officially); seat-based billing can penalize large but lightly-active user bases

Pricing volatility concerns in community; protocol is not WireGuard (may matter for security/performance perceptions)