Novade

Name: Novade
Brand: Novade

The leading field management software for the building and infrastructure industry

Est 2014|Valuation $52M|Raised $39.3M|24 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 33K|Web traffic 70K|FTEs 112|HQ City Hall, Central Region, Singapore, SG

MarketsHealth & Safety Quality Assurance

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis (where alternatives excel)

- **Procore** tends to be chosen when buyers want a single system of record for broad project management functions and ecosystem momentum; it also has far more public review volume, which reduces uncertainty. - **Fieldwire** tends to be favored for transparent pricing and straightforward field collaboration; it can be easier to justify for smaller teams or simpler workflows. - **Autodesk Construction Cloud / Autodesk Build** tends to be preferred where BIM/model coordination and design-to-build data flows matter most.

Customer testimonials comparing Novade to competitors

Novade’s integration documentation states explicitly that Novade is positioned as a complementary field execution and safety/quality solution rather than a direct replacement for full project management suites.

	Novade	Procore	Fieldwire (Hilti)
Starting Price	Free tier available; Standard plan priced per user with annual discount; higher tiers are quote-based	Quote-based (emphasizes unlimited users; starting price not published)	Basic free tier available; paid plans are per-user with annual billing options
Primary use case	Field execution: quality/HSE workflows, inspections, configurable forms, field data capture and analytics	End-to-end construction management platform across many functions and stakeholders	Field task management, plan viewing, checklists/forms, mobile coordination for project teams
Key Strength	Configurable workflows; focus on field compliance; published ISO 27001 and SOC 2 credentials; can integrate with Procore	Ecosystem scale and breadth; strong market adoption and larger review volume	Transparent pricing for basic tiers; mobile-focused workflows; quick adoption for many teams
Key Weakness	Smaller public review footprint; some complaints regarding pricing, support, and performance; not a full PM suite replacement	Pricing opacity; can be heavy for smaller teams; implementation can be substantial	May be less configurable for complex enterprise governance; advanced modules gated by higher tiers

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis (where alternatives excel)

Procore tends to be chosen when buyers want a single system of record for broad project management functions and ecosystem momentum; it also has far more public review volume, which reduces uncertainty.
Fieldwire tends to be favored for transparent pricing and straightforward field collaboration; it can be easier to justify for smaller teams or simpler workflows.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Autodesk Build tends to be preferred where BIM/model coordination and design-to-build data flows matter most.

Customer testimonials comparing Novade to competitors

Novade’s integration documentation states explicitly that Novade is positioned as a complementary field execution and safety/quality solution rather than a direct replacement for full project management suites.

	Novade	Procore	Fieldwire (Hilti)
Starting Price	Free tier available; Standard plan priced per user with annual discount; higher tiers are quote-based	Quote-based (emphasizes unlimited users; starting price not published)	Basic free tier available; paid plans are per-user with annual billing options
Primary use case	Field execution: quality/HSE workflows, inspections, configurable forms, field data capture and analytics	End-to-end construction management platform across many functions and stakeholders	Field task management, plan viewing, checklists/forms, mobile coordination for project teams
Key Strength	Configurable workflows; focus on field compliance; published ISO 27001 and SOC 2 credentials; can integrate with Procore	Ecosystem scale and breadth; strong market adoption and larger review volume	Transparent pricing for basic tiers; mobile-focused workflows; quick adoption for many teams
Key Weakness	Smaller public review footprint; some complaints regarding pricing, support, and performance; not a full PM suite replacement	Pricing opacity; can be heavy for smaller teams; implementation can be substantial	May be less configurable for complex enterprise governance; advanced modules gated by higher tiers