Obat

Name: Obat
Brand: Obat
Rating: 4.5 (700 reviews)

Invoicing software for contractors and self-employed - construction sector

Est 2019

LinkedIn 17K|Web traffic 303K|FTEs 271|HQ Nantes, Pays de la Loire, FR

MarketsInvoicing & Payment Processing

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Obat vs Tolteck - Multiple comparison articles suggest Tolteck’s entry pricing can be lower than Obat for similar core quoting/invoicing, though feature differences exist (one comparison notes signature/e-sign absent in Tolteck). - Tolteck is frequently described as simple for artisans; Obat presents additional platform features (including marketing/visibility add-ons). Obat vs Sage Batigest Connect - Sage positions Batigest Connect as end-to-end for BTP management (devis → facturation → chantier), and publishes tier pricing and compatibility with French e-invoicing requirements (vendor claim). - Trade-off: Sage tends to be more complex and can require partner ecosystem tools for certain mobile/field workflows (some expert-review site claims no dedicated mobile app and pricing opacity via resellers—though Sage does publish base pack prices). Obat vs EBP Bâtiment - EBP markets BTP-specific quoting/invoicing with progress invoicing and publishes a reference price point for an online plan (vendor claim). - EBP may appeal to buyers who prefer a more traditional BTP software vendor and clearer packaging around BTP workflows.

Customer testimonials comparing products

Direct, first-person “I switched from X to Obat because…” comparisons were limited in accessible sources. Community threads mention Obat among options for BTP, but detailed head-to-head migration stories are scarce in retrieved material.

Adoption trends / market signals

The French e-invoicing reform timeline (September 2026 obligations by company size) is driving tool selection urgency in the market generally; Obat and competitors communicate about compliance.

	Obat	Tolteck	Sage Batigest Connect
Starting Price	Not fully confirmed from Obat page snippet; third-party summaries indicate a low entry monthly tier with higher tiers	Frequently cited as having a lower-entry monthly tier (annual discounts reported by some summaries)	Vendor publishes tiered pricing with published base/mid/premium tiers on its site
Best For	BTP artisans/TPE needing quoting/invoicing and sector-specific compliance features	Small artisan teams wanting simple, transparent pricing and fast quoting	BTP firms needing deeper job-costing, purchasing/subcontracting flows, and Sage ecosystem integration
Key Strength	BTP-specific workflows (situations, margin view, libraries); user comments indicate responsive support	Simple, predictable pricing; artisan-focused UX	Broader, structured BTP management; integrates with Sage accounting; scalable for multi-user operations
Key Weakness	Price sensitivity; some stability complaints; API/integrations unclear	Signature/e-sign may be absent depending on plan/tooling; may be less platform-like than Obat	Heavier implementation; reseller/option complexity; some sources claim weaker value vs competitors

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Obat vs Tolteck

Multiple comparison articles suggest Tolteck’s entry pricing can be lower than Obat for similar core quoting/invoicing, though feature differences exist (one comparison notes signature/e-sign absent in Tolteck).
Tolteck is frequently described as simple for artisans; Obat presents additional platform features (including marketing/visibility add-ons).

Obat vs Sage Batigest Connect

Sage positions Batigest Connect as end-to-end for BTP management (devis → facturation → chantier), and publishes tier pricing and compatibility with French e-invoicing requirements (vendor claim).
Trade-off: Sage tends to be more complex and can require partner ecosystem tools for certain mobile/field workflows (some expert-review site claims no dedicated mobile app and pricing opacity via resellers—though Sage does publish base pack prices).

Obat vs EBP Bâtiment

EBP markets BTP-specific quoting/invoicing with progress invoicing and publishes a reference price point for an online plan (vendor claim).
EBP may appeal to buyers who prefer a more traditional BTP software vendor and clearer packaging around BTP workflows.

Customer testimonials comparing products

Adoption trends / market signals

The French e-invoicing reform timeline (September 2026 obligations by company size) is driving tool selection urgency in the market generally; Obat and competitors communicate about compliance.

	Obat	Tolteck	Sage Batigest Connect
Starting Price	Not fully confirmed from Obat page snippet; third-party summaries indicate a low entry monthly tier with higher tiers	Frequently cited as having a lower-entry monthly tier (annual discounts reported by some summaries)	Vendor publishes tiered pricing with published base/mid/premium tiers on its site
Best For	BTP artisans/TPE needing quoting/invoicing and sector-specific compliance features	Small artisan teams wanting simple, transparent pricing and fast quoting	BTP firms needing deeper job-costing, purchasing/subcontracting flows, and Sage ecosystem integration
Key Strength	BTP-specific workflows (situations, margin view, libraries); user comments indicate responsive support	Simple, predictable pricing; artisan-focused UX	Broader, structured BTP management; integrates with Sage accounting; scalable for multi-user operations
Key Weakness	Price sensitivity; some stability complaints; API/integrations unclear	Signature/e-sign may be absent depending on plan/tooling; may be less platform-like than Obat	Heavier implementation; reseller/option complexity; some sources claim weaker value vs competitors