Oddup

Name: Oddup
Brand: Oddup

Predict the future of global markets.

Est 2014|Valuation $155M|Raised $49.9M

LinkedIn 1K|Website|FTEs 11|HQ San Francisco, California, US

MarketsPrivate Markets Intelligence & Deal Sourcing Data

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

- Oddup versus Crunchbase: Oddup competes on pricing and the use of a ratings framework. Crunchbase competes on broader adoption, more visible documentation, and integration in existing sales and investing stacks. - Oddup versus Dealroom: Dealroom targets enterprise and team use with documented exports, API access, and SSO on enterprise tiers. Oddup may be more attractive for smaller teams seeking a lower-cost dataset supplemented by scoring overlays. - Oddup versus PitchBook: PitchBook is typically used for institutional diligence where deep ownership and transaction data are required at higher cost. Oddup appears positioned as a lighter-weight scouting tool rather than an institutional replacement for PitchBook.

Adoption and market signal

Public mindshare and review footprint for Crunchbase, Dealroom, and PitchBook are substantially larger. Oddup appears to have lower public conversation and fewer third-party reviews, which may indicate a smaller or more specialized user base.

	Oddup	Crunchbase	Dealroom
Starting Price	Free; paid from a low-cost tier	Published Pro tier at a higher monthly rate	Typically enterprise-priced with higher minimums
Recommended for	Budget-conscious startup scouting; lightweight due diligence; list building	Broad company and funding discovery with mainstream adoption; sales and investing workflows	Ecosystem mapping and exports for teams needing structured data access and enterprise controls
Key Strength	Lower-cost access and proprietary scoring/valuation metrics; combined investor/startup/markets coverage	Large public adoption and established workflow features	Strong enterprise packaging, export capabilities, and documented SSO on higher tiers
Key Weakness	Limited third-party review footprint and unclear public security certifications; scoring methodology not transparent	Dataset can include self-reported entries and may require verification	Higher price and minimum seat requirements may not suit individual users

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Oddup versus Crunchbase: Oddup competes on pricing and the use of a ratings framework. Crunchbase competes on broader adoption, more visible documentation, and integration in existing sales and investing stacks.
Oddup versus Dealroom: Dealroom targets enterprise and team use with documented exports, API access, and SSO on enterprise tiers. Oddup may be more attractive for smaller teams seeking a lower-cost dataset supplemented by scoring overlays.
Oddup versus PitchBook: PitchBook is typically used for institutional diligence where deep ownership and transaction data are required at higher cost. Oddup appears positioned as a lighter-weight scouting tool rather than an institutional replacement for PitchBook.

Adoption and market signal

	Oddup	Crunchbase	Dealroom
Starting Price	Free; paid from a low-cost tier	Published Pro tier at a higher monthly rate	Typically enterprise-priced with higher minimums
Recommended for	Budget-conscious startup scouting; lightweight due diligence; list building	Broad company and funding discovery with mainstream adoption; sales and investing workflows	Ecosystem mapping and exports for teams needing structured data access and enterprise controls
Key Strength	Lower-cost access and proprietary scoring/valuation metrics; combined investor/startup/markets coverage	Large public adoption and established workflow features	Strong enterprise packaging, export capabilities, and documented SSO on higher tiers
Key Weakness	Limited third-party review footprint and unclear public security certifications; scoring methodology not transparent	Dataset can include self-reported entries and may require verification	Higher price and minimum seat requirements may not suit individual users