Oliv AI

Name: Oliv AI
Brand: Oliv AI
Rating: 5 (1 reviews)

Oliv AI is a revenue intelligence platform that captures and analyzes customer interactions to generate meeting summaries and structured deal artifacts, performs CRM writebacks to systems such as Salesforce and HubSpot, and provides manager-oriented automation for pipeline risk detection and roll-ups.

Est 2018|Valuation $18M|Raised $5M|12 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 8K|Web traffic 21K|FTEs 40

MarketsConversation Intelligence

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Feature differentiation - The vendor emphasizes AI-driven agents that perform operational actions (for example, CRM updates and automated briefs) rather than only surfacing insights. These capabilities are vendor-stated and should be validated for reliability and control. - Gong differentiates on platform maturity, analytic breadth, and enterprise deployments. - Avoma differentiates on recorder-seat pricing models and a strong AI meeting assistant product with optional conversation intelligence add-ons. Pricing comparison - Oliv's headline entry price can appear lower than full enterprise CI and forecasting stacks. Procurement teams should model the total number of users requiring specific insight packs, manager agents, and whether enterprise security features necessitate a custom contract. Customer evidence quality - Gong and Avoma have larger public footprints and higher volumes of independent reviews. - Oliv's public review footprint is limited, which increases adoption risk for conservative buyers. Adoption trends - Recent public coverage highlights product evolution and launch messaging, but available evidence does not indicate broad market share. Treat the company as an early-stage vendor relative to incumbents and validate claims through pilots and references.

	Oliv AI	Gong	Avoma
Starting Price	Entry notetaker offered at a low per-user monthly rate with additional per-user insight packs; agent features priced separately on a variable basis (vendor pricing pages)	Quote-based; commonly involves a platform fee plus per-user licensing	Recorder-seat pricing for core meeting capture with optional add-ons for conversation intelligence (vendor pricing pages)
Suitable For	Teams seeking AI-driven automation for meeting capture, CRM updates, and manager brief generation, with modular spending options (vendor positioning)	Larger organizations seeking a mature conversation intelligence suite with deep analytics and enterprise operations	Teams seeking an AI meeting assistant with optional conversation intelligence add-ons and clearer recorder-seat pricing
Key Strength	Vendor emphasizes modular packaging, manager-oriented automation, and CRM automation capabilities	Mature feature set, large customer base, extensive ecosystem and analytics	Transparent recorder-seat pricing and established meeting assistant capabilities
Key Weakness	Limited independent review volume; some compliance claims not documented on vendor pages; packaging appears to change across public pages	Higher cost and implementation overhead; potential platform fees and RevOps investment	May not fully replace a full revenue intelligence/forecasting platform for complex enterprises

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Feature differentiation

The vendor emphasizes AI-driven agents that perform operational actions (for example, CRM updates and automated briefs) rather than only surfacing insights. These capabilities are vendor-stated and should be validated for reliability and control.
Gong differentiates on platform maturity, analytic breadth, and enterprise deployments.
Avoma differentiates on recorder-seat pricing models and a strong AI meeting assistant product with optional conversation intelligence add-ons.

Pricing comparison

Oliv's headline entry price can appear lower than full enterprise CI and forecasting stacks. Procurement teams should model the total number of users requiring specific insight packs, manager agents, and whether enterprise security features necessitate a custom contract.

Customer evidence quality

Gong and Avoma have larger public footprints and higher volumes of independent reviews.
Oliv's public review footprint is limited, which increases adoption risk for conservative buyers.

Adoption trends

Recent public coverage highlights product evolution and launch messaging, but available evidence does not indicate broad market share. Treat the company as an early-stage vendor relative to incumbents and validate claims through pilots and references.

	Oliv AI	Gong	Avoma
Starting Price	Entry notetaker offered at a low per-user monthly rate with additional per-user insight packs; agent features priced separately on a variable basis (vendor pricing pages)	Quote-based; commonly involves a platform fee plus per-user licensing	Recorder-seat pricing for core meeting capture with optional add-ons for conversation intelligence (vendor pricing pages)
Suitable For	Teams seeking AI-driven automation for meeting capture, CRM updates, and manager brief generation, with modular spending options (vendor positioning)	Larger organizations seeking a mature conversation intelligence suite with deep analytics and enterprise operations	Teams seeking an AI meeting assistant with optional conversation intelligence add-ons and clearer recorder-seat pricing
Key Strength	Vendor emphasizes modular packaging, manager-oriented automation, and CRM automation capabilities	Mature feature set, large customer base, extensive ecosystem and analytics	Transparent recorder-seat pricing and established meeting assistant capabilities
Key Weakness	Limited independent review volume; some compliance claims not documented on vendor pages; packaging appears to change across public pages	Higher cost and implementation overhead; potential platform fees and RevOps investment	May not fully replace a full revenue intelligence/forecasting platform for complex enterprises