Olive
Olive uses powerful AI and human collaboration tools to help consultants and enterprises make smart : https://olive.app/
Olive uses powerful AI and human collaboration tools to help consultants and enterprises make smart : https://olive.app/
Published Oct 2, 2026
| Starting Price | Public examples indicate a one-time starter package in the low thousands and platform access priced in the tens of thousands annually; consultant packages are offered on an annual basis | Price upon request; user-based annual licensing and edition-based packaging | Publicly described entry-level packages are positioned in the mid-to-high five-figure annual range for enterprise foundations |
| Best For | IT software selection requiring stakeholder collaboration, structured requirements, and buyer-side evaluation artifacts | Large enterprises in the SAP ecosystem needing formal sourcing events and networked workflows | Proposal/RFP response teams (seller-side), content library, governance, and AI assistance |
| Key Strength | Requirements weighting/scoring and buyer-side collaboration designed for IT sourcing; project-based approach can fit episodic evaluations | Broad enterprise procurement integration, sourcing governance, and SAP ecosystem connectivity | Mature response workflows, content library, approvals/governance, and established support model |
| Key Weakness | Some reviews cite performance, collaboration save/versioning gaps, customization and value-for-money concerns | Can be complex with a heavy portal UX; pricing and implementation can be substantial | Primarily seller-side; less oriented to buyer-side IT evaluation |
Olive vs SAP Ariba: Review comments suggest Olive may be perceived as more user-friendly than some enterprise portals for RFP activities. Ariba provides deeper enterprise procurement capabilities and ecosystem integration, which is relevant for SAP-centric organizations. For end-to-end procurement suite capability, Ariba and similar suites are typically stronger; for targeted IT selection workflows, Olive focuses on buyer-side evaluation.
Olive vs Loopio / Responsive: Loopio and Responsive are better known for seller-side response management (knowledge base, repeatable answers, governance). Olive includes seller-facing response features but emphasizes buyer-side evaluation in its marketing and product positioning. Organizations primarily focused on high-volume RFP responses (sales/proposal teams) may find seller-side tools more mature for that use case.
Suite vs point-solution decision: If an organization requires a single procurement suite spanning sourcing, contracts, invoicing, and supplier management, procurement suites (Coupa, Ivalua, JAGGAER, Ariba) generally offer broader coverage. If the primary pain point is software selection and RFP workflows, a focused product such as Olive may offer faster time-to-value for that specific process.