Oloid

Name: Oloid
Brand: Oloid

Frictionless and secure passwordless authentication for frontline workers

Est 2014|Valuation $48M|Raised $22.9M|7 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 9K|Web traffic 9K|FTEs 83|HQ Sunnyvale, California, US

MarketsTime, Attendance, & Leave Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Oloid is positioned to address specific needs: - Identity attribution on shared devices - Support for multiple physical factors (face, badge, NFC, QR) to enable policy flexibility and fallbacks - Integration with HRIS/SSO systems (promoted with Okta and Workday) - Offline-capable time clocking for low-connectivity job sites Where competitors may be stronger: - Imprivata: established workflows and installed base in healthcare for badge-based switching and workstation access - Okta/Entra: broader IAM ecosystem for knowledge-worker SSO, device trust, and application access; may be preferable when phone-based MFA or passkeys are feasible Adoption indicators: - Oloid documents enterprise integrations and has public materials describing funding activity. Independent analyst coverage from major firms was not identified in the sources reviewed; absence of such coverage limits third-party validation.

	Oloid	Imprivata OneSign	Okta (with Oloid integration or Okta alone for frontline)
Primary Use Case	Frontline/shared-device passwordless and identity attribution; mixed physical factors (face/badge/NFC/QR)	Healthcare and enterprise SSO with badge workflows; clinical workstation patterns	Core IdP/SSO capabilities for knowledge workers; may require overlays for shared-device frontline use cases
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (sales-led)	Example public references vary; historical bundled pricing reported in some sources	Pricing varies by product and contract; frontline shared-device needs often add integration/custom work
Key Strength	Designed for deskless/shared-device constraints; supports multiple physical factors and HRIS/SSO/PACS integrations	Mature healthcare SSO and badge tap workflows; extensive installed base in clinical settings	Broad IdP ecosystem, policy controls, and app catalog; strong for knowledge-worker SSO and device trust
Key Weakness	Hardware and UX constraints may surface (camera/tablet quality); limited public pricing/transparency; biometric governance complexity	Can be expensive at scale and may require additional tooling for provisioning	May not natively address shared kiosk or "no phone/no email" frontline constraints without an additional overlay

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Oloid is positioned to address specific needs:

Identity attribution on shared devices
Support for multiple physical factors (face, badge, NFC, QR) to enable policy flexibility and fallbacks
Integration with HRIS/SSO systems (promoted with Okta and Workday)
Offline-capable time clocking for low-connectivity job sites

Where competitors may be stronger:

Imprivata: established workflows and installed base in healthcare for badge-based switching and workstation access
Okta/Entra: broader IAM ecosystem for knowledge-worker SSO, device trust, and application access; may be preferable when phone-based MFA or passkeys are feasible

Adoption indicators:

Oloid documents enterprise integrations and has public materials describing funding activity. Independent analyst coverage from major firms was not identified in the sources reviewed; absence of such coverage limits third-party validation.

	Oloid	Imprivata OneSign	Okta (with Oloid integration or Okta alone for frontline)
Primary Use Case	Frontline/shared-device passwordless and identity attribution; mixed physical factors (face/badge/NFC/QR)	Healthcare and enterprise SSO with badge workflows; clinical workstation patterns	Core IdP/SSO capabilities for knowledge workers; may require overlays for shared-device frontline use cases
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (sales-led)	Example public references vary; historical bundled pricing reported in some sources	Pricing varies by product and contract; frontline shared-device needs often add integration/custom work
Key Strength	Designed for deskless/shared-device constraints; supports multiple physical factors and HRIS/SSO/PACS integrations	Mature healthcare SSO and badge tap workflows; extensive installed base in clinical settings	Broad IdP ecosystem, policy controls, and app catalog; strong for knowledge-worker SSO and device trust
Key Weakness	Hardware and UX constraints may surface (camera/tablet quality); limited public pricing/transparency; biometric governance complexity	Can be expensive at scale and may require additional tooling for provisioning	May not natively address shared kiosk or "no phone/no email" frontline constraints without an additional overlay