Onegreen

Name: Onegreen
Brand: Onegreen

Expertise regulatória e o melhor software de licenciamento ambiental juntos.

Est 2010|14 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 4K|Web traffic 3K|FTEs 4|HQ Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, BR

MarketsHealth & Safety Obligation & Renewal Management Obligation & Renewal Management

Published Sep 9, 2026

01Common complaints

- Company sizes or stages where this product is overkill or insufficient - Overkill - Small firms with only a handful of licenses/conditions may not require specialized tooling. - Insufficient - Very large global enterprises seeking a single global EHSQ system of record across incidents, audits, industrial hygiene, safety observations, etc., may find a specialized licensing product too narrow. - Industries or use cases where competitors are clearly stronger - If the requirement is enterprise-wide EHSQ management (not licensing-centric), Enablon/Intelex/VelocityEHS may be stronger fits. - If the primary need is legal update monitoring with transparent pricing for smaller teams, SOGI Legis may be more straightforward. - Technical requirements that this product cannot meet (based on public materials) - If procurement requires published SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certifications, Onegreen’s public materials (as reviewed) do not document these. - If you require published data residency options, encryption standards, subprocessor lists, or SLAs, you will likely need to obtain these directly during vendor due diligence. - Budget constraints that make alternatives more appropriate - Buyers sensitive to price transparency may prefer tools with published tiers (for example, SOGI Legis for legal monitoring). - Specific workflows or integrations where the product may fall short - If monitoring depends on specific government systems, and your operations span agencies with limited digital integration, you may not realize full value without manual processes. - Red flags in the buying process - Quote-only pricing without clear packaging can extend procurement cycles and complicate comparisons. - Limited third-party review visibility may increase the risk of unknown implementation/support issues — request references and run a pilot. - Current limitations acknowledged by the vendor - No public limitations section was located in the reviewed sources. - Features on the roadmap (not yet available) — note estimated dates if available - Historical posts mention functionalities under development, but no current public roadmap with dates was found. - Scale limitations (at what volume/size does it break down?) - No public performance or scale thresholds are documented. Vendor statements indicate use at high scale for certain customers; these claims were not independently verified. - Security or compliance gaps - Public evidence for SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / penetration testing / hosting and data residency was not located in the reviewed sources. - Technical debt or architectural limitations mentioned in reviews - Not available due to lack of accessible independent reviews. - API limitations or integration constraints - API and integration details were not clearly documented in public materials reviewed.

02Why they buy

- Competitive advantages supported by evidence in the public record (not solely vendor claims) - Independent public validation is limited. However, materials in the public record indicate the platform is used in regulated, audit-sensitive contexts and has been referenced in external reports and audits. - Features that differentiate the product from broader EHS suites - Specialized licensing lifecycle focus (licenses + conditions + deadlines + evidence) - Document extraction capabilities to assist with importing licensing documents from PDFs - Georeferenced map views for projects - Areas where competitors have clear advantages - Enterprise suites typically have more publicly documented security/compliance programs and broader independent review coverage. - Legal monitoring tools like SOGI Legis provide more transparent self-serve pricing for smaller teams.

03Field reports

Customer Testimonials

#### Availability caveat (important) - Mainstream global B2B review platforms (G2, TrustRadius) did not surface a clear Onegreen profile with accessible user reviews during this research. - Gartner Peer Insights did not show an obvious listing for Onegreen in the relevant searches performed; search results primarily surfaced unrelated products due to name collisions. - Capterra includes a directory entry that mentions Onegreen, but accessible content primarily reflects a directory listing rather than a set of verified user reviews. #### Vendor-published testimonials (presented as vendor statements) - The vendor’s marketing materials include several customer statements emphasizing centralization of license management, reduced risk of missed deadlines, and handling of large volumes of conditions. These are vendor-published testimonials and should be treated as promotional material rather than independent verification. - Examples (paraphrased from vendor-published testimonials): - A user identified as Sara Ferreira (Analista de Meio Ambiente) stated implementation of Onegreen centralized license management and reduced the risk of license expiry and missed deadlines. - A user identified as Pedro Alvarenga (Sócio Proprietário) described managing several hundred conditions monthly and noted the software aids organization of those activities. - A user identified as Poliana Miranda (Analista de Meio Ambiente) described the product as useful for license and condition control, including reporting and charts. #### Third-party evidence of use (more independent than testimonials) - Onegreen’s blog includes a vendor-posted report that Grupo Bauminas used Onegreen to manage a portfolio of environmental licenses and conditions and transitioned away from spreadsheets; this content is published by the vendor. - A Onegreen training post lists customer companies whose users attended training, including Aliança Energia, AngloGold Ashanti, Grupo Bauminas, BRK Ambiental, and Gerdau. - External documents reference operational use of Onegreen in compliance contexts. For example, a BRK-related environmental and social review summary states compliance activities are carried out through specialized environmental licensing management software identified as Onegreen. A Responsible Mining Assurance audit report references Onegreen system reports as part of evidence reviewed. #### Negative reviews / complaints (what was found) - On Reclame Aqui (a Brazilian consumer complaint platform) there were no complaints registered for a recent reporting period; this indicates an absence of documented public complaints on that channel in the examined time window but should not be interpreted as evidence of no issues. - The limited presence on mainstream review platforms reduces the ability to validate support quality, reliability, and usability through broad peer feedback. #### Why customers chose Onegreen (inferred from testimonials and product design) - To centralize licensing obligations, evidence, and renewals in a single source of record - To reduce the risk of missing permit deadlines and conditions - To replace spreadsheets for complex portfolios - To improve reporting to management and readiness for audits/inspections #### Why some customers left for competitors (churn reasons) - No direct customer churn narratives were located in accessible public sources.

Case Studies

- Bauminas example (vendor-published) - Vendor claim: Grupo Bauminas used Onegreen to manage a large, distributed portfolio of licenses and numerous conditions, transitioning from spreadsheets to online updating. - Critical view: - The case provides a reference architecture for a large, distributed licensing portfolio, but the materials are vendor-published and lack independent verification of quantified outcomes (for example, reductions in fines, audit time saved, or measured compliance improvements). - Large-scale monitoring metrics (press/vendor-asserted) - Press coverage cites vendor-asserted scale metrics such as a single customer monitoring a large number of licenses and many conditions, and total monitored conditions reported at scale. - Critical view: - These are scale claims reported in press coverage and likely originate from vendor statements; definitions and methodologies (e.g., what qualifies as a condition, active vs archived, duplicates) are not disclosed. - External compliance evidence usage (more independent) - An external audit report references Onegreen outputs as part of compliance evidence reviewed. - Critical view: - This supports that Onegreen outputs can be included in audit contexts, but it does not directly measure the product’s performance, usability, or return on investment.

04Best fit

- Company sizes: specific employee counts and revenue ranges - Best inferred fit: - Mid-market to enterprise organizations in Brazil with multiple sites/projects and a material licensing/permit burden - Organizations that manage a large number of licensing obligations and need centralized evidence management - Industries and verticals where adoption is strongest (with customer examples) - Mining: references to mineradora origins; training attendee list includes AngloGold Ashanti and Ferrous Resources - Energy: Aliança Energia referenced in training attendee list; vendor materials reference hydropower and wind operations - Industrial / metals: Gerdau referenced in training attendee list - Sanitation: BRK Ambiental referenced in training attendee list and external ESG documents - Ports/airports and oil & gas are noted as target sectors in vendor materials - Roles and personas: decision makers AND end users - Decision makers - Environmental / ESG directors - HSE leaders - Compliance and legal leadership (especially given integration into Ius Natura ecosystem) - Operations leadership at regulated sites - End users - Environmental analysts and coordinators managing daily conditions and evidence - Consultants coordinating multiple client licensing processes - Pain points and challenges the product addresses - Missed deadlines for license renewals or condition deliverables - Spreadsheet-based tracking that breaks at scale - Difficulty producing audit-ready evidence and status reporting - Low visibility across multiple projects/sites - Qualification criteria: what makes a GREAT fit - High volume of licenses/conditions and recurring reporting - Multi-site operations with decentralized ownership but centralized governance - Need to demonstrate traceability and evidence to regulators, auditors, or financiers - Willingness to operationalize workflows (ownership, deadlines, evidence standards) - Deal disqualifiers: what makes a POOR fit - Very small organizations with only a few licenses/conditions where spreadsheets or lightweight tools are sufficient - Organizations requiring publicly documented security certifications (SOC 2 / ISO 27001) as a procurement gate, unless the vendor can provide those under NDA - Organizations that require extensive EHS modules beyond licensing in a single unified suite - Real customer examples with company names when available - Company names appearing in vendor training materials include: Aliança Energia, AngloGold Ashanti, Grupo Bauminas, BRK Ambiental, Gerdau.

05The pitch

What the product does (core value proposition in objective terms)

- Onegreen is a Brazil-focused environmental licensing management platform designed to centralize and operationalize the lifecycle of environmental permitting ("licenciamento ambiental"). It organizes licenses, permit conditions/commitments ("condicionantes"), documents/evidence, tasks, deadlines, and status tracking in a single system. - The product is positioned to move licensing from reactive compliance activities to a deadline-driven workflow with dashboards, alerts, and documentation structured for audits. - Vendor-listed differentiators include: - AI-assisted extraction of licenses/conditions from PDFs - A monitoring panel for ongoing process updates ("Radar ambiental") - Georeferenced (map-based) views for projects/sites

Target market and market positioning

Target users include environmental managers and specialists working in regulated, asset-heavy industries (mining, energy, oil & gas, ports/airports, sanitation, industry) who manage multi-site licensing portfolios.
The product is specialized for licensing management rather than broader EHS incident management.

Get a comprehensive analysis of Onegreen including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

Download full report →