OnSiteIQ

Name: OnSiteIQ
Brand: OnsiteIQ

OnSiteIQ is a construction intelligence platform that provides recurring 360° reality capture, floor-plan-aligned imagery, and AI-derived analytics for progress tracking, risk identification, and portfolio-level visibility.

Est 2017|Valuation $22.5M|Raised $39.9M|1 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 8K|Website|Web traffic 2K|FTEs 60|HQ New York, New York, US

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Where OnSiteIQ appears to differentiate: - Emphasis on capital-side stakeholders and owner oversight (developers, equity partners, lenders) rather than primarily contractor-focused workflows. - A service-supported capture model (capture specialists) that can reduce the need for internal staff to run captures. - Portfolio-level analytics and risk-indicator claims emphasized in vendor materials and press. Where competitors may excel: - Market validation and public review density: some competitors may have broader third-party review content and public awareness. - Enterprise-readiness transparency: competitors may list enterprise security and administrative features (SSO, dedicated CSM) more explicitly. - Pricing transparency: certain competitors provide clearer starting-cost context in public materials. Adoption trend signals: - The vendor reports monitoring projects across many markets, and funding announcements have been used to indicate revenue growth in prior periods. These are vendor and press-based signals and should be validated in procurement.

	OnSiteIQ	OpenSpace	HoloBuilder (FARO)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based; fees tied to sq ft per terms)	Public FAQs provide baseline project-cost context	Not listed; customizable subscription based on project needs
Primary Fit	CRE owners/developers/lenders needing vendor-provided capture plus analytics	Teams wanting 360 capture and automated progress documentation	Firms wanting 360 documentation, dashboards, and enterprise controls (SSO noted)
Key Strength	Vendor-provided capture specialist network and owner/investor-focused analytics	Known reality-capture brand with public pricing guidance	Integration with broader ecosystem and explicit enterprise features cited
Key Weakness	Limited third-party end-user reviews publicly visible; limited public security documentation; contract terms may be rigid	Pricing tied to construction volume and may be expensive at scale	Quote-based pricing and potentially complex packaging; may require self-managed capture workflows

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Where OnSiteIQ appears to differentiate:

Emphasis on capital-side stakeholders and owner oversight (developers, equity partners, lenders) rather than primarily contractor-focused workflows.
A service-supported capture model (capture specialists) that can reduce the need for internal staff to run captures.
Portfolio-level analytics and risk-indicator claims emphasized in vendor materials and press.

Where competitors may excel:

Market validation and public review density: some competitors may have broader third-party review content and public awareness.
Enterprise-readiness transparency: competitors may list enterprise security and administrative features (SSO, dedicated CSM) more explicitly.
Pricing transparency: certain competitors provide clearer starting-cost context in public materials.

Adoption trend signals:

The vendor reports monitoring projects across many markets, and funding announcements have been used to indicate revenue growth in prior periods. These are vendor and press-based signals and should be validated in procurement.

	OnSiteIQ	OpenSpace	HoloBuilder (FARO)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based; fees tied to sq ft per terms)	Public FAQs provide baseline project-cost context	Not listed; customizable subscription based on project needs
Primary Fit	CRE owners/developers/lenders needing vendor-provided capture plus analytics	Teams wanting 360 capture and automated progress documentation	Firms wanting 360 documentation, dashboards, and enterprise controls (SSO noted)
Key Strength	Vendor-provided capture specialist network and owner/investor-focused analytics	Known reality-capture brand with public pricing guidance	Integration with broader ecosystem and explicit enterprise features cited
Key Weakness	Limited third-party end-user reviews publicly visible; limited public security documentation; contract terms may be rigid	Pricing tied to construction volume and may be expensive at scale	Quote-based pricing and potentially complex packaging; may require self-managed capture workflows

OnSiteIQ

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

02Market Map