OpenText Application Security Aviator

Name: OpenText Application Security Aviator
Brand: OpenText
Rating: 4.6 (161 reviews)

Leader

Information Reimagined

Est 1991|Valuation $6.8B|Raised $14.3B

LinkedIn 550K|Website|Web traffic 1.1M|FTEs 19,900|HQ Waterloo, Ontario, CA

MarketsApplication Security Testing (AST)SAST

OpenText Application Security Aviator screenshot

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Potential strengths of OpenText Aviator: - Coverage across many languages and frameworks as reported by the vendor, which may be relevant for organizations with diverse, legacy, or multi-language portfolios. - Deployment flexibility (SaaS or off-cloud) depending on customer needs; buyers should verify the exact support and feature set for each model. - Integration with Fortify findings and SSC workflows, which may be useful for organizations that already use Fortify tools. Potential strengths of alternatives: - Developer experience and rapid onboarding: several newer tools emphasize ease of use and CI ergonomics. - Pricing transparency: some competitors publish entry-level pricing that helps small- and mid-sized teams evaluate initial costs. - Managed onboarding or perceived support responsiveness may differ between vendors. Sources: Official vendor and competitor product pages; review platforms; industry community discussions.

Market adoption signals

OpenText highlights recognitions in industry reports and analyst coverage. Such signals indicate continued enterprise relevance for the broader Fortify product family, but do not constitute third-party validation of Aviator-specific outcomes.

Source: Vendor press materials and analyst coverage.

	OpenText Application Security Aviator (Fortify)	Snyk (SAST/SCA platform)	Veracode (AST platform)
Starting Price	Contact sales / not publicly published; third‑party review platforms indicate vendor-managed pricing	Published entry-level per-seat pricing available; enterprise pricing is custom	Contact sales; enterprise/quote-based pricing
Typical fit	Large enterprises standardized on Fortify, seeking deep enterprise scanning and AI-assisted remediation integrated with Fortify workflows	Developer-focused teams seeking fast onboarding and broad coverage (SCA/SAST/IaC/container) with published entry pricing	Enterprises seeking a SaaS AST program with governance and policy workflows
Key Strength	Integration with Fortify ecosystem; deployment flexibility (SaaS or off-cloud); vendor-described AI auditing and remediation workflow	Published entry pricing; developer workflow focus; integrated vulnerability remediation across multiple artifact types	Mature SaaS delivery model; governance and policy workflows; broad adoption
Key Weakness	Public pricing not transparent; Fortify ecosystem can add operational complexity; community discussions cite CI/CD integration and support issues in some cases	Costs can increase with scale and with product add-ons; enterprise pricing often custom	Enterprise pricing and migration effort can be a consideration for some customers

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Potential strengths of OpenText Aviator:

Coverage across many languages and frameworks as reported by the vendor, which may be relevant for organizations with diverse, legacy, or multi-language portfolios.
Deployment flexibility (SaaS or off-cloud) depending on customer needs; buyers should verify the exact support and feature set for each model.
Integration with Fortify findings and SSC workflows, which may be useful for organizations that already use Fortify tools.

Potential strengths of alternatives:

Developer experience and rapid onboarding: several newer tools emphasize ease of use and CI ergonomics.
Pricing transparency: some competitors publish entry-level pricing that helps small- and mid-sized teams evaluate initial costs.
Managed onboarding or perceived support responsiveness may differ between vendors.

Sources: Official vendor and competitor product pages; review platforms; industry community discussions.

Market adoption signals

Source: Vendor press materials and analyst coverage.

	OpenText Application Security Aviator (Fortify)	Snyk (SAST/SCA platform)	Veracode (AST platform)
Starting Price	Contact sales / not publicly published; third‑party review platforms indicate vendor-managed pricing	Published entry-level per-seat pricing available; enterprise pricing is custom	Contact sales; enterprise/quote-based pricing
Typical fit	Large enterprises standardized on Fortify, seeking deep enterprise scanning and AI-assisted remediation integrated with Fortify workflows	Developer-focused teams seeking fast onboarding and broad coverage (SCA/SAST/IaC/container) with published entry pricing	Enterprises seeking a SaaS AST program with governance and policy workflows
Key Strength	Integration with Fortify ecosystem; deployment flexibility (SaaS or off-cloud); vendor-described AI auditing and remediation workflow	Published entry pricing; developer workflow focus; integrated vulnerability remediation across multiple artifact types	Mature SaaS delivery model; governance and policy workflows; broad adoption
Key Weakness	Public pricing not transparent; Fortify ecosystem can add operational complexity; community discussions cite CI/CD integration and support issues in some cases	Costs can increase with scale and with product add-ons; enterprise pricing often custom	Enterprise pricing and migration effort can be a consideration for some customers