OpenText Endpoint Management

Name: OpenText Endpoint Management
Brand: OpenText
Rating: 4.1 (496 reviews)

Leader

Information Reimagined

Est 1991|Valuation $6.3B|Raised $14.3B

LinkedIn 550K|Website|Web traffic 1.1M|FTEs 19,900|HQ Waterloo, Ontario, CA

MarketsIT Asset Management (ITAM)Endpoint Management (UEM)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Microsoft Intune is commonly selected when organizations already pay for Microsoft 365 and prioritize native identity and compliance integration; core plan pricing is publicly published. - ManageEngine Endpoint Central is frequently evaluated as a broadly functional alternative with positive support feedback in some review channels. - HCL BigFix competes on large-scale patching and compliance capabilities. - VMware Workspace ONE and Ivanti Neurons remain major enterprise UEM options for heterogeneous device environments.

Adoption / market signals

Gartner Peer Insights shows a modest number of ratings for ZENworks Suite, while G2 review volumes for some ZENworks sub-products appear limited. Low review volume on a given platform can indicate lower representation in that review community or fewer collected reviews, and procurement teams should account for this when evaluating peer-review evidence.

	OpenText Endpoint Management / ZENworks	Microsoft Intune	HCL BigFix
Starting Price	Quote-based; published pricing not prominent	Published per-user subscription pricing available from the vendor	Typically licensed per endpoint; pricing varies by contract and procurement channel
Primary fit	Windows-heavy environments requiring traditional endpoint operations and suite consolidation	Organizations standardized on Microsoft 365/Entra seeking cloud-native UEM and identity integration	Organizations requiring large-scale patching/compliance and operational endpoint query workflows
Key capabilities emphasized	Traditional endpoint management: imaging, software distribution, patching, inventory	Identity-driven device compliance, cloud-native integration with Microsoft security services	Scale and operational rigor for patching and compliance workflows
Common considerations / weaknesses	Product complexity; SaaS pricing is not publicly transparent; some reports of performance concerns in heavy-reporting environments	Licensing complexity and add-on costs; potential ecosystem lock-in to Microsoft	Administration experience and module complexity can be significant; pricing and packaging vary by contract

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Microsoft Intune is commonly selected when organizations already pay for Microsoft 365 and prioritize native identity and compliance integration; core plan pricing is publicly published.
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is frequently evaluated as a broadly functional alternative with positive support feedback in some review channels.
HCL BigFix competes on large-scale patching and compliance capabilities.
VMware Workspace ONE and Ivanti Neurons remain major enterprise UEM options for heterogeneous device environments.

Adoption / market signals

Gartner Peer Insights shows a modest number of ratings for ZENworks Suite, while G2 review volumes for some ZENworks sub-products appear limited. Low review volume on a given platform can indicate lower representation in that review community or fewer collected reviews, and procurement teams should account for this when evaluating peer-review evidence.

	OpenText Endpoint Management / ZENworks	Microsoft Intune	HCL BigFix
Starting Price	Quote-based; published pricing not prominent	Published per-user subscription pricing available from the vendor	Typically licensed per endpoint; pricing varies by contract and procurement channel
Primary fit	Windows-heavy environments requiring traditional endpoint operations and suite consolidation	Organizations standardized on Microsoft 365/Entra seeking cloud-native UEM and identity integration	Organizations requiring large-scale patching/compliance and operational endpoint query workflows
Key capabilities emphasized	Traditional endpoint management: imaging, software distribution, patching, inventory	Identity-driven device compliance, cloud-native integration with Microsoft security services	Scale and operational rigor for patching and compliance workflows
Common considerations / weaknesses	Product complexity; SaaS pricing is not publicly transparent; some reports of performance concerns in heavy-reporting environments	Licensing complexity and add-on costs; potential ecosystem lock-in to Microsoft	Administration experience and module complexity can be significant; pricing and packaging vary by contract