Opsin

Name: Opsin
Brand: Opsin
Rating: 5 (4 reviews)

AI Native

Stop GenAI Oversharing

Est 2024|Raised $7.3M

LinkedIn 5K|Website|FTEs 20|HQ San Jose, California, US

MarketsData Security Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

- Opsin is positioned toward governance for GenAI interactions with enterprise collaboration platforms and rapid identification of oversharing risk tied to M365 and similar environments. - Grip Security emphasizes a broader SaaS security control plane that addresses shadow SaaS and identity-centric SaaS posture management. - Protect AI emphasizes security across AI model and deployment workflows and may be more appropriate for organizations building custom LLM applications and managing model supply chain concerns. - Large incumbent vendors (e.g., Cisco) may provide integrated offerings that appeal to organizations seeking vendor consolidation and broader platform bundling. Recommendation: Select vendors based on whether the core procurement problem is collaboration platform oversharing, SaaS posture, or model/workflow protection.

	Opsin	Grip Security	Protect AI
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Custom quote (pricing page requests contact)	Not publicly listed (custom enterprise pricing)
Primary use cases	M365/Workspace-heavy enterprises needing governance for AI-related data exposure and prompt/use monitoring	SaaS security posture, shadow SaaS discovery, and SaaS control plane	AI security focused on model and deployment workflow protections, especially for cloud AI services
Noted strengths	Short assessment timelines as reported; focus on permissions/oversharing remediation for collaboration platforms; monitoring for prompt/upload exposure	Broad SaaS discovery and integrations; identity-centric SaaS control plane	Focus on AI development/deployment pipeline security and cloud AI ecosystem integrations
Noted limitations	Limited public technical/security documentation; limited independent review footprint outside early listings; unclear coverage for custom LLM apps beyond major enterprise copilots	Less specialized in Copilot/oversharing-specific use cases	Pricing and scope may be less suited if primary need is only M365 permissions oversharing

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Opsin is positioned toward governance for GenAI interactions with enterprise collaboration platforms and rapid identification of oversharing risk tied to M365 and similar environments.
Grip Security emphasizes a broader SaaS security control plane that addresses shadow SaaS and identity-centric SaaS posture management.
Protect AI emphasizes security across AI model and deployment workflows and may be more appropriate for organizations building custom LLM applications and managing model supply chain concerns.
Large incumbent vendors (e.g., Cisco) may provide integrated offerings that appeal to organizations seeking vendor consolidation and broader platform bundling.

Recommendation: Select vendors based on whether the core procurement problem is collaboration platform oversharing, SaaS posture, or model/workflow protection.

	Opsin	Grip Security	Protect AI
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Custom quote (pricing page requests contact)	Not publicly listed (custom enterprise pricing)
Primary use cases	M365/Workspace-heavy enterprises needing governance for AI-related data exposure and prompt/use monitoring	SaaS security posture, shadow SaaS discovery, and SaaS control plane	AI security focused on model and deployment workflow protections, especially for cloud AI services
Noted strengths	Short assessment timelines as reported; focus on permissions/oversharing remediation for collaboration platforms; monitoring for prompt/upload exposure	Broad SaaS discovery and integrations; identity-centric SaaS control plane	Focus on AI development/deployment pipeline security and cloud AI ecosystem integrations
Noted limitations	Limited public technical/security documentation; limited independent review footprint outside early listings; unclear coverage for custom LLM apps beyond major enterprise copilots	Less specialized in Copilot/oversharing-specific use cases	Pricing and scope may be less suited if primary need is only M365 permissions oversharing